More on FDA Draft Guidelines for "Follow-on" Biologic Drug Approval Pathway

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP
Contact

Last Thursday, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued draft guidances pursuant to its authority under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (see "FDA Publishes Draft Guidelines for Biosimilar Product Development").  The draft guidances are intended by the agency to implement the follow-on biologic drug pathway mandated by the statute, and are set forth in three separate guidances directed to:

1) Scientific Considerations in Demonstrating Biosimilarity to a Reference Product

2) Quality Considerations in Demonstrating Biosimilarity to a Reference Protein Product

3) Biosimilars: Questions and Answers Regarding Implementation of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009

The first draft guidance, directed to scientific considerations concerning biosimilarity, is "focused" on therapeutic polypeptides and uses a "step-wise," "totality of the evidence" approach."  As set forth in detail in the draft guidance, this approach addresses the question of biosimilarity using various analytical method "step-by-step," where the results of one assay are interpreted and used to select additional assays that will provide additional information missing or unclear from earlier assays.  The first step is always "rigorous" comparisons of the physicochemical characteristics and functional properties of a candidate biosimilar drug, performed in comparison with the reference drug product.  From these results, the draft guidance recommends animal toxicity testing (as expressly required by the statute), human pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics studies, immunogenicity studies, and clinical safety and effectiveness trials.  The draft guidance also recommends postmarketing safety monitoring for biosimilar products having a reference drug product known to be associated with significant risks of adverse events.  This guidance also defines the use of the term "should" as meaning "recommended" rather than "required" by the agency.

Please see full article below for more information.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Written by:

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide