Second Circuit’s July 2011 Opinion: CSX Corp. v. The Children’s Investment Fund Management
Whether two or more shareholders have formed a group under Section 13(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) has always been a difficult, and well litigated, question. A shareholder or group that owns more than 5% of a public company’s shares must file publicly a Schedule 13D disclosing its affiliates and its intentions with respect to the company. Making an agreement or taking concerted action may transform individual shareholders into a group, forcing them to tip their hand publicly sooner than they would like. Because poison pill agreements borrow the definition of beneficial ownership from Rule 13d-3, the formation of a group may also have economic consequences in addition to public disclosure requirements. A determination that several shareholders constitute a group, with each shareholder beneficially owning each other’s shares, could cause them to cross the ownership threshold under a poison pill, catastrophically reducing the value of their shares.
Shareholder concern about unintentionally forming a group has chilled communications among large holders of shares in U.S. public companies. U.S. and English law both address this subject, but with important differences.
Please see full publication below for more information.