Resolving a Key Legal Issue, California Supreme Court Holds Individual Employees Not Liable for Retaliation Under the FEHA

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Contact

California?s Fair Employment and Housing Act (?FEHA?) prohibits employers from discriminating against or harassing their employees on the basis of protected categories. Likewise, the FEHA prohibits employers from retaliating against employees who have complained about discrimination or harassment or have otherwise exercised their rights under the FEHA. A decade ago, the California Supreme Court held in Reno v. Baird, 18 Cal. 4th 640 (1998), that individual employees may not be held personally liable for discrimination under the FEHA. Over the past several years, both state and federal courts have taken pains to distinguish Reno from cases involving retaliation and have held that individual employees may be held liable for retaliation. In a sharply divided opinion in Jones v. Lodge at Torrey Pines, S151022, March 3, 2008, the California Supreme Court reversed those decisions, holding that individual employees may not be held personally liable for retaliation under the FEHA.

See full newsletter for more.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Contact
more
less

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide