Courts Grapple With the Standard for Infringing Use of System Claims

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
Contact

I. Introduction

Three years ago in BMC Resources Inc. v. Paymentech L.P., 498 F.3d 1373, 1379, 84 USPQ2d 1545 (Fed. Cir. 2007) (74 PTCJ 644, 9/28/07), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit first clarified the legal standard for infringing use of method claims where each of the steps is not performed by a single entity. Since then, the issue of so-called ‘‘divided infringement’’ has been front and center in many patent cases, as litigants have tested the boundaries of the doctrine, primarily in cases involving business method, internet, and communications-related patents. Two related developments have flowed from this case law. First, several courts have extended the concept of divided infringement to apparatus or system claims, an issue not yet squarely addressed by the Federal Circuit. Second, some courts have more generally considered the standard for infringing use of system claims, an issue for which there is little guidance in the case law. This article explores the recent case law developments in these areas.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
Contact
more
less

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide