Suit Limitations Provisions are Enforceable. Except When They’re Not

by Carlton Fields

Suit Limitations Provisions are Enforceable.  Except When They’re Not.

When might a court find a reasonable and enforceable suit limitation provision neither reasonable nor enforceable?  According to New York’s highest court, it’s when the provision would bar a claim to enforce the replacement coverage under a property policy, and where completion of the repairs that constitute the replacement is a condition precedent to the suit.  In Executive Plaza, LLC v. Peerless Ins. Co., 5 N.E.3d 989, 990 (N.Y. 2014), the Court of Appeals of New York, answering a certified question from the Second Circuit, held that a two-year suit limitation period—which has been upheld in other circumstances—is “unreasonable and unenforceable”  when “applied to a case in which the property cannot reasonably be replaced in two years.”

Executive Plaza v. Peerless

In this case, a fire destroyed the insured office building on February 23, 2007.  The insured immediately retained both an architect and construction company, and the insurer paid the actual cash value of the property the following July.  To rebuild, the insured had to obtain a variance and certain forms of consent from local government entities.  Although the application for review was first submitted in June 2007, a final building permit did not issue until November 2008, and the property was not “substantially replaced” until October 2010.

The insurance policy at issue contained a two-year suit limitation provision which provided:

No one may bring a legal action against us under this insurance unless:

  • There has been full compliance with all of the terms of this insurance; and
  • The action is brought within 2 years after the date on which the direct physical loss or damage occurred.

The “terms of … insurance” to which the limitation provision referred included procedures by which the insured could seek replacement cost coverage after receiving the actual cash value of the damaged property.  Replacement coverage required the satisfaction of two conditions:

  • We will not pay on a replacement cost basis for any loss or damage:
  • Until the lost or damaged property is actually repaired or replaced; and
  • Unless the repairs or replacement are made as soon as reasonably possible after the loss or damage.

On February 23, 2009, before it had finished rebuilding, but within the two-year suit limitation period, the insured filed suit in federal court against the insurer to recover replacement costs.  Because construction was not complete, the district court dismissed the claim as not yet ripe.

After the property had been substantially rebuilt, the insured once again sought replacement cost coverage under the policy.  The insurer rejected the demand, and the insured filed suit again.  This time, the district court dismissed the action as time-barred (under the terms of the policy), and the insured appealed to the Second Circuit.  The Second Circuit noted the tension between the suit limitation and replacement cost provisions, and it certified the following question to the New York Court of Appeals:

If a fire insurance policy contains

  1. a provision allowing reimbursement of replacement costs only after the property was replaced and requiring the property to be replaced “as soon as reasonably possible after the loss”; and
  2. a provision requiring an insured to bring suit within two years after the loss;

Is an insured covered for replacement costs if the insured property cannot reasonably be replaced within two years?

For the Court of Appeals, it All Depends …

As indicated above, the state court answered the certified question in the affirmative.  In reaching its decision, the Court of Appeals recognized that “an agreement which modifies the Statute of Limitations by specifying a shorter, but reasonable, period within which to commence an action is enforceable.”  Moreover, there is nothing inherently unreasonable about a two-year suit limitation provision; indeed, the court acknowledged that New York courts have enforced shorter suit limitation periods.  Thus, the issue was not with the duration of the suit limitation period, but with having the period begin to run from the date of loss.  The court explained:

It is neither fair nor reasonable to require a suit within two years from the date of the loss, while imposing a condition precedent to the suit—in this case, completion of replacement of the property—that cannot be met within that two-year period. A ‘limitation period’ that expires before suit can be brought is not really a limitation period at all, but simply a nullification of the claim. It is true that nothing required defendant to insure plaintiff for replacement cost in excess of actual cash value, but having chosen to do so defendant may not insist on a ‘limitation period’ that renders the coverage valueless when the repairs are time-consuming.

The court quoted Judge Crane’s dissenting opinion in Continental Leather Co. v. Liverpool, Brazil & Riv. Plate Steam Nav. Co., 182 N.E.207 (N.Y. 1932), for the proposition that: “[T]he period of time within which an action must be brought . . . should be fair and reasonable, in view of the circumstances of each particular case. . . . The circumstances, not the time, must be the determining factor.”

With the certified question answered in the affirmative, the case was returned to the Second Circuit, which remanded the case to the district court “to address the factual questions of whether [the insured] could reasonably replace the damaged property within two years and whether it replaced the property ‘as soon as reasonably possible.’”  Executive Plaza, LLC v. Executive Ins. Co., 2014 WL 929092 (2d Cir. Mar. 11, 2014).

Wait til Next Time

It remains to be seen whether the ruling of the Court of Appeals will erode the certainty an insurer expects in applying suit limitation periods.  In Executive Plaza, the terms of the replacement cost provision invited a case-by-case inquiry—they stated that repairs had to be completed “as soon as reasonably possible”—and the evidence created a genuine issue about whether the insured had acted diligently, both in effecting the repairs and in seeking timely resolution of the coverage issue.  Future cases might involve policies requiring that repairs be completed (for example) within two years; in those cases, will the court also find that enforcement of the suit limitation provision depends on the resolution of questions of fact?  And what other fact patterns, besides the timeliness of the repairs, might have the effect of making a straightforward, two-year limitation period “unreasonable”?

Until the courts answer those questions, insurers will need to look carefully at the facts and circumstances before assuming they can rely on suit limitation periods to avoid paying a replacement cost claim made outside the limitation period.  Moreover, this holding would seem to counsel in favor of on-going dialogue between the insured and insurer during the rebuild process and, perhaps, a tolling agreement with respect to the suit limitation period.

Written by:

Carlton Fields

Carlton Fields on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.