The Cost of Doing Nothing? Injunctive Relief and the Amount in Controversy

by Nelson Brown & Co.

While plaintiffs in class action cases ordinarily seek monetary damages, many incorporate claims for injunctive or declaratory relief as well. Injunctive and declaratory relief can complicate matters for courts when it comes time to determine whether a case’s amount in controversy exceeds $5 million, as necessary, to support removal under CAFA. This is particularly true when alleged monetary damages alone are insufficient to support removal.

Value of Injunctive and Declaratory Relief in Non-Class Action Cases

For declaratory and injunctive claims in non-class action cases, the U.S. Supreme Court has noted that “it is well established that the amount in controversy is measured by the value of the object of the litigation.” A number of courts have clarified that the value of the sought after injunctive or declaratory relief cannot support removal if it is too speculative or immeasurable. Courts have typically taken one of two approaches in determining the potential value of an injunctive or declaratory claim. Some courts—including the Fifth, Eighth and Eleventh Circuits—apply the “plaintiff viewpoint” rule, which focuses upon the value of the right the plaintiff seeks to enforce. Other jurisdictions (including the First, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth and Tenth Circuits) apply the “either viewpoint” rule. Under the latter approach, courts assess the jurisdictional amount by looking at “either the benefit to the plaintiff or the cost to the defendant of the requested relief.” A number of these jurisdictions have recognized exceptions to this rule for class actions due to the pre-CAFA prohibition on aggregating the claims of multiple plaintiffs in determining the amount in controversy.

Injunctive and Declaratory Relief Under CAFA

According to the Senate Judiciary Committee’s report, removal under CAFA is only proper when the value of the litigation exceeds $5 million from the viewpoint of either party, and “regardless of the type of relief sought.” Some federal courts have therefore held that the “either viewpoint” rule governs injunctive class actions, notwithstanding pre-CAFA case law discussed above. Courts applying the “plaintiff viewpoint” rule have recognized that the value of declaratory or injunctive claims should be aggregated to determine eligibility for removal under CAFA.

South Florida Wellness, Inc. v. Allstate

In its recent decision in South Florida Wellness, Inc. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 745 F.3d 1312 (11th Cir. 2014), the Eleventh Circuit considered whether CAFA establishes federal jurisdiction over a putative class action in which the plaintiffs sought only declaratory relief. The Florida state court complaint specifically sought a declaration that the defendant’s personal injury protection (PIP) insurance policies did not contain language clearly and unambiguously stipulating that PIP payments would be based upon a statutory fee schedule. Under Florida law, insurers that do not base PIP payments upon a statutory fee schedule are instead required to pay 80% of the reasonable costs of medical treatment.

The defendant insurer removed the case to federal court. In support of its contention that the action satisfied CAFA’s amount in controversy requirement, the defendant submitted an employee affidavit stating that if the putative class members received the declaratory judgment, they would be entitled to receive over $68 million in additional PIP benefits. In remanding, the trial court held that the defendant’s argument was “too speculative” because the insurer failed to demonstrate that the declaratory judgment “will necessarily trigger a flow of money to the plaintiffs.”

In reversing the trial court, the Eleventh Circuit noted that although the potential class claimants “might have to take an extra step or two” to recover damages after prevailing on their declaratory claims, it was not true that “determining that the amount in controversy exceeds $5 million is too speculative of a task.” Instead, the court observed that claimants were unlikely to leave the substantial amount of money at issue on the table if they obtained declaratory relief.

The court also stated that this conclusion does not conflict with its determination in a previous case that the amount in controversy requirement could not be satisfied by an injunctive claim that sought to preclude an auto rental company from selling insurance to its customers. While in the previous case the amount in controversy was measured in potential future transactions, the present case concerned transactions that already occurred.

The Eleventh Circuit concluded by emphasizing that federal jurisdiction is not foreclosed by the potential that claimants may not recover the full amount at issue. The relevant issue for removal is the amount in controversy, not the amount that could be recovered.

As South Florida Wellness demonstrates, a defendant can satisfy CAFA’s $5 million amount in controversy showing in a declaratory or injunctive action by presenting a detailed and well-supported analysis of the expected costs associated with the proposed relief. Defendants should keep in mind, however, that this kind of analysis may not be feasible in many cases where the requested relief concerns changes affecting future business practices instead of retroactive relief.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Nelson Brown & Co. | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Nelson Brown & Co.

Nelson Brown & Co. on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.