AB 32 Setback: Tentative Court Ruling Threatens to Delay Implementation of California Carbon Market

Morrison & Foerster LLP
Contact

In 2006, the California Legislature passed the landmark Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (“AB 32”) directing the California Air Resources Board (“CARB”) to prepare a Scoping Plan to identify how best to achieve its greenhouse gas emission (“GHG”) reductions.

The state’s ground-breaking climate change legislation has been the subject of intense scrutiny and public comment since its inception. Now, the immediate future of AB 32’s mandate may be in jeopardy, due to a tentative California superior court decision holding that CARB violated the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) in implementing AB 32 because it failed to consider alternatives to a cap-and-trade market and approved its Scoping Plan without adequate environmental review.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morrison & Foerster LLP
Contact
more
less

Morrison & Foerster LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide