Hexion v. Huntsman: Delaware Court Reiterates High Bar to Finding an MAE; Provides Guidance on Requirements of "Reasonable Best Efforts"

Morrison & Foerster LLP
Contact

On September 29, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued its opinion in the dispute between Hexion Specialty Chemicals and Huntsman over their $10.6 billion merger agreement. In sum, the court found that:

*despite a downturn in the business of Huntsman, no material adverse effect (MAE) had occurred, and

*Hexion had breached its obligations to use reasonable best efforts to facilitate the merger and, because at least some of these breaches were ?knowing and intentional,? could be liable for damages in excess of a $325 million cap that might otherwise apply.

Accordingly, the court ordered Hexion to perform its covenants to facilitate the merger, including its covenants with respect to Hexion?s contemplated financing. The court noted that the merger agreement did not contemplate an order to consummate the merger itself, although a failure to consummate the merger in violation of the merger agreement could lead to monetary damages against Hexion.

See full legal update for more information.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morrison & Foerster LLP
Contact
more
less

Morrison & Foerster LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide