Guggenheim Capital v. Toumei

Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for an Appeal Bond

Ronald Coleman

Plaintiffs in this trademark default judgment case seek to eliminate the appeal by defendants, whom we came to represent for post-trial proceedings, by having the court impose a $100,000 bond as a condition of continuing their appeal -- despite the court having earlier authorized the defendants to proceed in forma pauperis.

The motion was denied (see related document).

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info: Legal Memoranda: Post-Trial Motions | Federal, 2nd Circuit, New York | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ronald Coleman, Dhillon Law Group, Inc | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Ronald Coleman

Dhillon Law Group, Inc on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.