Fish & Richardson

Contact
Share
Info
One Marina Park Drive
Boston, MA 02110-1878, United States
Phone: +1 (617) 368-2115
Fax: (617) 542-8906
Areas Of Practice
  • Antitrust & Trade Regulation
  • Appellate Practice
  • Class Action
  • Commercial Law & Contracts
  • Communications & Media Law
  • Constitutional Law
  • Finance & Banking
  • Intellectual Property
  • International Law & Trade
  • Litigation
  • Products Liability
  • Science, Computers, & Tech
  • Transportation
See more
Locations
Other U.S. Locations
  • California
  • D.C.
  • Delaware
  • Georgia
  • Massachusetts
  • Minnesota
  • New York
  • Texas
Other Countries
  • China
Number of Attorneys
200+ Attorneys

Navigating Change at the USPTO

While it may seem like the only constant at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is change, that sentiment rings especially true in 2025. With a new presidential administration in the White House and numerous…more
 /  Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

En Banc Federal Circuit Grants Google a New Trial in EcoFactor Case

On May 21, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting en banc, released its opinion in EcoFactor, Inc. v. Google, LLC. In an 8-2 decision, the court reversed a $20 million jury verdict, holding that the Western…more
 /  Civil Procedure, Civil Remedies, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

John Squires Faces the Senate Judiciary Committee

John Squires, President Trump’s nominee for Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee on May 21, his first hearing since being nominated. Squires’ portions…more
 /  Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

HHS Sets Most-Favored-Nation Price Targets for Pharmaceuticals

On May 20, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released further details on its plan to implement President Trump’s May 12 executive order aimed at lowering drug prices by requiring pharmaceutical companies to sell…more
 /  Health, International Law & Trade, Science, Computers, & Technology

Acting USPTO Director Stewart Issues First Decisions Under Interim Discretionary Denial Process

On Friday, May 16, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued discretionary denial decisions in the first four matters considered under the USPTO’s new interim workload management process…more
 /  Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

No Space at the Trademark Office for US SPACE FORCE

In a rare precedential decision involving Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently upheld a denial by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) of applications filed for US…more
 /  Intellectual Property

How Trump’s Latest Drug Price EO Could Impact Pharma

On May 12, 2025, President Trump issued an executive order aimed at lowering prescription drug prices titled “Delivering Most-Favored-Nation Prescription Drug Pricing to American Patients.” Generally, the order directs the…more
 /  Health, International Law & Trade

ITC Round-Up: Q1 2025

The first quarter of 2025 saw the International Trade Commission issue the following public orders addressing a wide variety of issues ranging from evaluation of significance for domestic industry to staying remedial orders…more
 /  Administrative Law, Intellectual Property, International Law & Trade

Federal Circuit Clarifies Limits of Patent Eligibility for Machine Learning Claims

In a decision with implications for machine learning-related patent filings, the Federal Circuit in Recentive Analytics, Inc. v. Fox Corp., No. 2023-2437 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 18, 2025), affirmed the District of Delaware’s dismissal…more
 /  Communications & Media Law, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

More Is More: Ensure Your Mark Is Protectable Before You Enforce

The Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Heritage Alliance v. American Policy Roundtable, Case No. 24-1155 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 9, 2025), provides a salient reminder to brand owners seeking to build value in descriptive trademarks —…more
 /  Intellectual Property

[Webinar] Analyzing SEPs: Strategies for Licensing Negotiations - May 15th, 1:30 pm ET

Most standard setting organizations require their members to agree to license their standard essential patents (SEPs) on fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory terms. But there is no bright-line rule for determining whether a…more
 /  Intellectual Property

Can Clinical Trials Negate Patentability for Pharma Inventions?

The answer to this inquiry is “yes” — but maybe “no.” Will confidentiality agreements shield any prior art concerns? Once again, maybe “yes” — but maybe “no.” Indeed, do clinical trials constitute an experimental use that does…more
 /  Commercial Law & Contracts, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

PTAB Issues FAQs on Interim Process for Workload Management

Last week, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) issued a list of FAQs related to the new bifurcated process for discretionary denial established in the March 26 memorandum issued by Acting Director Stewart. The FAQs follow…more
 /  Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

Munich Appeals Court Reinforces Security-Centric FRAND Framework in SEP Dispute

Standard-essential patent (SEP) licensing remains a critical issue in Europe, where political bodies and national courts at times diverge in the interpretation of fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) licensing…more
 /  Commercial Law & Contracts, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

Federal Circuit Finds Beer Trademark Application Nothing but "Chicken Scratch"

In yet another recent example of the need for care in establishing a full record when appealing the denial of a trademark application, on April 14, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld the denial of an…more
 /  Administrative Law, Intellectual Property
Showing 1-15 of 711 Results
/
View per page
Page: of 48
This profile may constitute attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Any correspondence with this profile holder does not constitute a client/attorney relationship. Neither the content on this profile nor transmissions between you and the profile holder through this profile are intended to provide legal or other advice or to create an attorney-client relationship.

"My best business intelligence,
in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide