Hinshaw & Culbertson - The LHD/ERISA Advisor

Contact
Share
Info
Firm Profile: Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
151 North Franklin Street
Suite 2500
Chicago, IL 60601, United States
Phone: 612-334-2586
Fax: 612-334-8888
Areas Of Practice
  • Health
Locations
Other U.S. Locations
  • Arizona
  • California
  • Florida
  • Illinois
  • Indiana
  • Massachusetts
  • Minnesota
  • Missouri
  • New York
  • Rhode Island
  • Wisconsin
Other Countries
  • United Kingdom

The LHD/ERISA Advisor: District Court Holds that Plan Administrator Was ERISA Fiduciary

In Technibilt Grp. Ins. Plan & Technibilt, Ltd v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of North Carolina (W.D. N.C., Feb. 3, 2020), a North Carolina district court held that a plan administrator was an ERISA fiduciary for the purpose of…more

Breach of Duty, Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), Employer Group Health Plans, Fiduciary Duty, Health Insurance

See all updates »

The LHD/ERISA Advisor: ERISA Exhaustion Requirement Not Satisfied by Verbal Appeal When Plan Required Written Appeal

In Ligotti v. United Healthcare Services, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106992 (S.D. Fla., June 8, 2021), a Florida district court held that a health care provider challenging claim denials on behalf of his patients cannot satisfy…more

Additional Discovery, Administrative Remedies, Appeals, Discovery, Employee Benefits

See all updates »

The LHD/ERISA Advisor: Court Rules LTD Benefits Properly Terminated After Plaintiff Failed to Undergo Recommended Surgery for Disability

In Hall v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117331 (N.D. Cal. June 23, 2021), a California district court held that an ERISA claim administrator properly terminated long-term disability (LTD) benefits after the…more

Disability, Disability Benefits, Employee Benefits, Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), Long Term Disability Insurance

See all updates »

The LHD/ERISA Advisor: Texas District Court Upholds Denial of LTD Benefits Because Claimant Did Not Prove Functional Limitations Within Benefit Waiting Period

In Calkin v. United States Life Ins. Co., 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82110 (S.D. TX., April 29, 2021), a Texas district court affirmed the insurer’s denial of LTD benefits, holding that while a claimant established diagnoses, he…more

Denial of Insurance Coverage, Disability, Employee Benefits, Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), Long Term Disability Insurance

See all updates »

The LHD/ERISA Advisor: District Court Finds Reduction in Monthly LTD Benefit Due to IRA Rollover Appropriate Under Plan Terms

In DeBold v. Liberty Life Assur. Co. of Bos., 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120153 (D. Mass, June 28, 2021), a district court held that an ERISA plan administrator could reduce an insured's monthly long-term disability (LTD) benefit…more

Breach of Duty, De Novo Standard of Review, Denial of Benefits, Disability Benefits, Employee Benefits

See all updates »

The LHD/ERISA Advisor – June 2021: Second Circuit Issues Statute of Limitations Ruling Favorable to Healthcare Plan Administrators

Federal law does not supply a statute of limitations for a claim seeking equitable relief under ERISA, 29 U.S.C. 1132(a)(3), and therefore federal courts borrow the limitations period of the state-law cause of action to which…more

Amended Complaints, Declaratory Judgment Act, Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), Equitable Relief, Federal Rule 12(b)(6)

See all updates »

The LHD/ERISA Advisor - October 2020: Insurance Coverage During Involuntary Legal Holds Under California Law

Mental health patients are sometimes hospitalized under a legal hold allowing their temporary hospitalization. Medical providers seeking payments for services provided to patients subject to a legal hold argue, in both the…more

Arbitration, California, Denial of Insurance Coverage, Health Insurance, Involuntary Legal Holds

See all updates »

The LHD/ERISA Advisor: Ninth Circuit Joins Fourth Circuit in Holding that Equitable Estoppel is Barred Where Use Would Contradict Express Terms of an ERISA Plan

In Wong v. Flynn-Kerper, 999 F.3d 1205 (9th Cir. 2021), the Ninth Circuit barred the use of equitable estoppel to challenge the purchase price of company shares under an ERISA stock ownership plan when such use would contradict…more

Contract Terms, Employee Benefits, Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), Equitable Estoppel, ESOP

See all updates »

This profile may constitute attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Any correspondence with this profile holder does not constitute a client/attorney relationship. Neither the content on this profile nor transmissions between you and the profile holder through this profile are intended to provide legal or other advice or to create an attorney-client relationship.

"My best business intelligence,
in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide