Proskauer - The Patent Playbook

Contact
Share
Info
Firm Profile: Proskauer Rose LLP
Eleven Times Square
(Eighth Avenue & 41st Street)
New York, NY 10036-8299, United States
Phone: 212.969.3000
Fax: 212.969.2900
Areas Of Practice
  • Health
  • Intellectual Property
  • Science, Computers, & Tech
Locations
Other U.S. Locations
  • California
  • D.C.
  • Florida
  • Illinois
  • Louisiana
  • Massachusetts
  • New York
Other Countries
  • Brazil
  • China
  • France
  • Hong Kong
  • United Kingdom

U.S. Medical Device Manufacturers Should Take Note of New European Medical Device Regulations

The European Union has been a leader in recent years when it comes to regulatory reform intended to protect individuals’ privacy, safety, and health. As Europe leads the way, regulators in the United States often follow suit on…more

Cybersecurity, EU, Life Sciences, Manufacturers, Medical Devices

See all updates »

"Commercially Reasonable Efforts” Clauses in Drug Development Deals: What Level of Protection Do They Really Provide?

Pharmaceutical drug development is expensive. One recent study estimates that the median cost to develop a new drug is $985 million, while the average is $1.3 billion. And those figures appear to be on the low end of a broad…more

Commercially Reasonable Efforts, Contract Terms, Drug Design, Funding Arrangements, IP License

See all updates »

BridgeBio Transaction Reflects Healthy Market for FDA Priority Review Vouchers

BridgeBio’s recently announced sale of an FDA Priority Review Voucher for $110 million reflects a robust secondary market for these regulatory fast passes. Prices for Priority Review Voucher (“PRVs”) reflect the high stakes…more

Biologics, Expedited FDA Approval, Food & Drug Regulations, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Healthcare

See all updates »

The Supreme Court Kept the Door Open to Genus Claims

The U.S. Supreme Court on May 18, 2023 delivered its decision on the scope of the patent enablement requirement, set forth in 35 U.S.C. § 112, in the antibody dispute Amgen, Inc. v. Sanofi. While the parties obtained finality,…more

Amgen, Biosimilars, Biotechnology, CAFC, Genus

See all updates »

In the Orphan Drug Approval Race, Winner Takes All? Ramifications of Catalyst Pharms. v. Becerra

How is orphan drug exclusivity affected when the FDA-approved use for an orphan drug is arguably narrower than the treatment of the rare disease it was designated for? By way of background, a sponsor can obtain orphan drug…more

Biopharmaceutical, FDA Approval, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Generic Drugs, Life Sciences

See all updates »

Interesting Recent § 101 Cases – Structural Components Are Not Enough

Your Package Could Not Be Delivered – District of Delaware Strikes Electronic Storage Room Claims as Patent Ineligible - Judge Choe-Groves of the United States Court of International Trade granted Defendant’s Motion to…more

Alice/Mayo, Innovative Technology, Intellectual Property Litigation, Motion to Dismiss, Patent Invalidity

See all updates »

Calls for USPTO to Adopt Policies to Modulate Drug Pricing

In the wake of the nomination of Kathi Vidal as Director of the USPTO, there will be significant attention paid to the agency’s responses to calls from both the executive and legislative branches to remake the agency’s perceived…more

Biden Administration, Biosimilars, Biotechnology, Competition, Drug Pricing

See all updates »

The Supreme Court Kept the Door Open to Genus Claims

The U.S. Supreme Court on May 18, 2023 delivered its decision on the scope of the patent enablement requirement, set forth in 35 U.S.C. § 112, in the antibody dispute Amgen, Inc. v. Sanofi. While the parties obtained finality,…more

Amgen, Biosimilars, Biotechnology, CAFC, Genus

See all updates »

"Commercially Reasonable Efforts” Clauses in Drug Development Deals: What Level of Protection Do They Really Provide?

Pharmaceutical drug development is expensive. One recent study estimates that the median cost to develop a new drug is $985 million, while the average is $1.3 billion. And those figures appear to be on the low end of a broad…more

Commercially Reasonable Efforts, Contract Terms, Drug Design, Funding Arrangements, IP License

See all updates »

The Seventh Circuit Asks, “What’s Wrong With Having Lots of Patents?”

The answer? Not much, in itself. If one patent is good, 132 is probably fine too. That was Judge Easterbrook’s reasoning in a recent decision addressing indirect purchasers’ antitrust challenge to AbbVie’s so-called “patent…more

Patents, Pharmaceutical Patents, Sherman Act

See all updates »

A New Dawn for Patent Owners? Breaking Down the PERA and PREVAIL Acts of 2025

In a move that could reshape the U.S. patent landscape, Congress has reintroduced two major pieces of legislation: the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act (PERA) of 2025 and the Promoting and Respecting Economically Vital…more

Innovative Technology, Intellectual Property Protection, Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding, New Legislation, Patent Litigation

See all updates »

The Seventh Circuit Asks, “What’s Wrong With Having Lots of Patents?”

The answer? Not much, in itself. If one patent is good, 132 is probably fine too. That was Judge Easterbrook’s reasoning in a recent decision addressing indirect purchasers’ antitrust challenge to AbbVie’s so-called “patent…more

Patents, Pharmaceutical Patents, Sherman Act

See all updates »

The Seventh Circuit Asks, “What’s Wrong With Having Lots of Patents?”

The answer? Not much, in itself. If one patent is good, 132 is probably fine too. That was Judge Easterbrook’s reasoning in a recent decision addressing indirect purchasers’ antitrust challenge to AbbVie’s so-called “patent…more

Patents, Pharmaceutical Patents, Sherman Act

See all updates »

Value and Risk of Overlapping Intellectual Property Protections

A well-orchestrated intellectual property strategy requires carefully and thoughtfully leveraging copyright, trademark, and patent laws, as highlighted by a recent decision handed down by the United Sates Court of Appeals for…more

Appeals, Functionality, Intellectual Property Litigation, Litigation Strategies, Patent Litigation

See all updates »

Navigating Parallel Proceedings: Lessons Learned As Time Runs Out for AliveCor in its Apple Smartwatch Patent Dispute

On March 7, 2025, the Federal Circuit issued a decision resolving the ongoing patent litigation between AliveCor and Apple concerning methods of cardiac monitoring purportedly employed in certain of Apple’s Watches. The Court’s…more

Appeals, Discovery Disputes, Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding, International Trade Commission (ITC), Medical Devices

See all updates »

The Supreme Court Kept the Door Open to Genus Claims

The U.S. Supreme Court on May 18, 2023 delivered its decision on the scope of the patent enablement requirement, set forth in 35 U.S.C. § 112, in the antibody dispute Amgen, Inc. v. Sanofi. While the parties obtained finality,…more

Amgen, Biosimilars, Biotechnology, CAFC, Genus

See all updates »

Skinny Labels May Not Be Dead: Delaware District Court Distinguishes GSK, Dismisses Induced Infringement Claim

In one of the first district court opinions applying the Federal Circuit’s recent GSK decision on induced infringement in the context of label carve-outs, Judge Richard Andrews in the District of Delaware held that plaintiff…more

Amarin, Generic Drugs, GlaxoSmithKline, Induced Infringement, JMOL

See all updates »

EcoFactor v. Google: The Federal Circuit Clarifies Damages Expert Admissibility

Admissibility standards for patent damages experts has come under scrutiny. Previously, we highlighted the EcoFactor v. Google case regarding Google’s petition for rehearing en banc to address the admissibility of EcoFactor’s…more

Appeals, Contract Interpretation, Damages, Evidence, Expert Testimony

See all updates »

“Negative” Patent Claim Limitations—May They be Adequately Described by Omission?

Patent claim limitations that are “negative”—that is, claim limitations specifying the absence of a particular element from the patent claim—can pose a dilemma in the written description context. How much of the specification…more

Intellectual Property Protection, Life Sciences, Novartis, Patent Infringement, Patent Litigation

See all updates »

Interesting Recent § 101 Cases – Structural Components Are Not Enough

Your Package Could Not Be Delivered – District of Delaware Strikes Electronic Storage Room Claims as Patent Ineligible - Judge Choe-Groves of the United States Court of International Trade granted Defendant’s Motion to…more

Alice/Mayo, Innovative Technology, Intellectual Property Litigation, Motion to Dismiss, Patent Invalidity

See all updates »

The Crucial Role of Patent Due Diligence in Mergers & Acquisitions: Spotting Patent Litigation Risks Before Closing a Deal

In today’s rapidly evolving business landscape, mergers and acquisitions (“M&A”) remain a common strategic priority for companies aiming to grow, innovate, or strengthen their market position. However, the complexity of these…more

Acquisitions, Contract Terms, Due Diligence, Intellectual Property Litigation, Mergers

See all updates »

Ingenico Inc. v. IOENGINE, LLC: Federal Circuit Resolves the IPR Estoppel Split

In what is certain to become a landmark decision, the Federal Circuit has resolved a long-standing question that divided patent litigators and judges alike: does IPR estoppel apply to physical systems (“system art”) described in…more

Appeals, CAFC, Estoppel, Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding, Judicial Authority

See all updates »

Alleged Theft of Drug Pricing Trade Secrets Could Cost Both Victim and Thief

Life Sciences is an area ripe for trade secrets misappropriation litigation. In recent news, Merz Pharmaceuticals, LLC filed a lawsuit under the North Carolina Uniform Trade Secrets Act alleging that its former director of…more

Commercial Litigation, Confidentiality Agreements, Customer Lists, Drug Pricing, Employment Contract

See all updates »

This profile may constitute attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Any correspondence with this profile holder does not constitute a client/attorney relationship. Neither the content on this profile nor transmissions between you and the profile holder through this profile are intended to provide legal or other advice or to create an attorney-client relationship.

"My best business intelligence,
in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide