As a non-precedential decision on claim construction, Horizon Pharma, Inc. v. Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Inc., may not be relevant to any other case, but it caught my attention as an example of the perils of claim drafting....more
In Genzyme Corp. v. Dr. Reddy’s Labs. Ltd., the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court decision upholding Genzyme’s Orange Book listed patent for the cancer drug Mozobil® against an obviousness challenge, because the...more
In Intendis GmbH v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc., USA, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court decision that found infringement under the doctrine of equivalents. This case shows that the doctrine of equivalents...more
5/24/2016
/ Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) ,
CAFC ,
De Novo Standard of Review ,
Doctrine of Equivalents ,
Estoppel ,
FDA Approval ,
Generic Drugs ,
Orange Book ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Pharmaceutical Patents ,
Prior Art
On January 26, 2015, the Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated, and remanded Shire Development LLC v. Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., to the Federal Circuit “for further consideration in light of Teva Pharmaceuticals USA,...more
1/30/2015
/ Certiorari ,
Claim Construction ,
Clear Error Standard ,
De Novo Standard of Review ,
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patents ,
Pharmaceutical Industry ,
Pharmaceutical Patents ,
Remand ,
SCOTUS ,
Shire Development v Watson ,
Teva v Sandoz ,
Vacated
On January 20, 2015, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., finding that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure call for some deference in the claim construction standard of...more
In a six-four en banc decision in Lighting Ballast Control LLC v. Philips Electronics North Am. Corp., a divided Federal Circuit confirmed its practice of de novo claim construction review. The main question arising from the...more