Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff

Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff

Foley & Lardner LLP

Contact  |  View Bio  |  RSS

Latest Posts › Patent Litigation

Share:

Federal Circuit Holds That Even Functional Claims Require Structural Fence Posts

In AbbVie Deutschland Gmbh v. Janssen Biotech, Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court decision that found AbbVie’s patents directed to anti-IL-12 antibodies invalid for lack of adequate written description. As...more

7/14/2014 - Biotechnology Functionality Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents Pharmaceutical Pharmaceutical Patents

Federal Circuit Looks for a Different Kind of Unexpected Results in BMS v. Teva

In Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s finding that BMS’s Baraclude® patent is invalid as obvious. In so doing, the court gave little weight to...more

7/3/2014 - ANDA Bristol-Myers Squibb Obviousness Patent Litigation Patents Pharmaceutical Pharmaceutical Patents Prescription Drugs Teva Pharmaceuticals

How the Supreme Court Decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Undermines the USPTO Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance

On June 19, 2014, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, finding that patents directed to “a computer-implemented scheme for mitigating ‘settlement risk’” were invalid as being drawn...more

6/25/2014 - Alice Corporation CLS Bank CLS Bank v Alice Corp Mayo v. Prometheus Patent Litigation Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Patents Risk Mitigation SCOTUS Software

Supreme Court: Generic Computer Implementation Does Not Render Abstract Ideas Patentable

On June 19, 2014, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int’l, No. 13-298, which was previously discussed. In a unanimous opinion by Justice Thomas, the Court held, consistent with its precedent,...more

6/20/2014 - Alice Corporation CLS Bank CLS Bank v Alice Corp Mayo v. Prometheus Patent Litigation Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Patents Popular Risk Mitigation Software

Federal Circuit Says Mistaken Belief Required for Reissue Error

In In re Dinsmore, the Federal Circuit held that the reissue process could not be used to correct an alleged defect in a terminal disclaimer between patents that were not commonly owned, because there had been no “mistaken...more

6/17/2014 - Patent Litigation Patents Reissue Patents Terminal Disclaimer USPTO

Is Evidence of Obviousness Always Required?

In K/S HIMPP v. Hear-Wear Technologies, LLC, the Federal Circuit affirmed the decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) that upheld the decision of the Central Reexamination Unit Examiner that refused to hold...more

6/13/2014 - Inter Partes Review Proceedings Obviousness Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board Patents USPTO

Supreme Court Adopts Reasonable Certainty Test for Definiteness

On June 2, 2014, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc., rejecting the Federal Circuit’s “insolubly ambiguous” test for patent claim indefiniteness under 35 USC § 112, and...more

6/11/2014 - Definiteness Indefiniteness Nautilus Inc. v. Biosig Instruments Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents Reasonable Certainty Standard SCOTUS

Federal Circuit Finds Consumer Watchdog Lacks Standing to Appeal Reexamination Decision Upholding WARF Stem Cell Patent

In Consumer Watchdog v. Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, the Federal Circuit held that an inter partes reexamination requester must establish an injury in fact sufficient to confer Article III standing in order to appeal...more

6/6/2014 - America Invents Act Appeals Inter Partes Review Proceedings Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board Patents Post-Grant Review Stem cells WARF

Supreme Court Reverses Federal Circuit on Induced Infringement in Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai

On June 2, 2014, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc., reversing the en banc Federal Circuit decision and holding that there can be no liability for induced...more

6/4/2014 - Akamai Technologies Infringement Limelight Limelight Networks Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents SCOTUS

Federal Circuit Vacates Infringement of Braintree SUPREP Patent

In a divided opinion issued in Braintree Labs., Inc. v. Novel Labs., Inc., the Federal Circuit reversed the district court on one of two challenged claim construction issues and vacated the district court’s finding of...more

5/30/2014 - ANDA Claim Construction Generic Drugs Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents

Federal Circuit Keeps Burden of Patent Clarity on Applicants on Issues of Patent Indefiniteness

In In re Packard, the Federal Circuit affirmed the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decision upholding the rejection of Packard’s claims for indefiniteness. The per curiam decision approaches the issue from the...more

5/8/2014 - Indefiniteness Patent Applications Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board Patents USPTO

Federal Circuit Affirms Validity of Tarka Patent on Combination Pharmaceutical Product

The Federal Circuit decision in Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc., USA, addresses several interesting issues, but is most likely to be cited by other patent holders for its affirmance of the...more

5/2/2014 - Patent Litigation Patents Pharmaceutical Patents Tarka

Federal Circuit Expands Doctrine of Obviousness Type Double Patenting

Can a later-granted patent render an earlier-granted patent invalid for obviousness-type double patenting? In Gilead Sciences, Inc. v. Natco Pharma Limited, the Federal Circuit held that it can. This decision could have...more

4/29/2014 - Gilead Sciences Obviousness Patent Litigation Patents

Court Won't Review USPTO Denial of Inter Partes Review

In a decision issued on April 18, 2014, Judge Payne of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granted the USPTO’s motion to dismiss the case brought by Dominion Dealer Solutions, LLC to challenge the...more

4/21/2014 - Inter Partes Review Proceedings Patent Litigation Patents USPTO

Update on Myriad Appeal and Announcing a Public Forum on the USPTO 101 Guidelines

Myriad has appealed the district court decision that denied its motion for a preliminary injunction against Ambry Genetics Corp. According to a report in Bloomberg BNA Life Sciences Law & Industry Report™, on April 14, 2014,...more

4/17/2014 - Ambry AMP v Myriad Appeals Life Sciences Myriad Myriad v Ambry Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents Pharmaceutical USPTO

Federal Circuit Find Fractures in Roche Boniva Patents

In Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s summary judgment that two Roche Boniva patents are invalid as obvious. The conclusion of obviousness is not particularly remarkable...more

4/15/2014 - FDA Generic Drugs Hoffman LaRoche Patent Litigation Patents Pharmaceutical Prior Art Summary Judgment

Federal Circuit Refuses to Find Implied License for Endo Opana Patents

In Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Actavis, Inc., the Federal Circuit reversed the district court’s decision denying Endo’s motion for summary judgment of infringement based on an implied license. The Federal Circuit found that...more

4/7/2014 - Licenses Patent Litigation Patents

Delayed Restriction Requirement Does Not Result in Patent Term Adjustment for Divisional Application

In Mohsenzadeh v. Lee (decided March 19, 2014), the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia held that the Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) statute does not provide PTA to a divisional application when the USPTO...more

3/28/2014 - Patent Litigation Patent Term Adjustment Patent Terms USPTO

Five Things You Should Know About the USPTO Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Guidelines

The new USPTO patent subject matter eligibility guidelines set forth a detailed analytical framework for evaluating whether claims satisfy the patent subject matter eligibility requirement of 35 USC § 101. If you are an...more

3/17/2014 - Biotechnology Life Sciences Patent Litigation Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Patents USPTO

Federal Circuit Finds Easy Solution to Avodart Solvate Written Description Question

Are claims that recite a “solvate” of a chemical compound invalid for lack of written description if the patent does not describe any specific solvates? In GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. Banner Pharmacaps, Inc., the Federal Circuit...more

3/13/2014 - Chemicals Claim Construction FDA GlaxoSmithKline Patent Litigation Patents Pharmaceutical Written Descriptions

Do Pharmaceutical Compositions Have Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Under the New USPTO Guidelines?

The USPTO’s new patent subject matter eligibility guidelines (the “Guidelines”) include examples that apply the multi-factored analysis mandated by the Guidelines to compositions that include one or more “natural products” as...more

3/11/2014 - Patent Litigation Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Patents Pharmaceutical USPTO

Split Federal Circuit Hews to De Novo Claim Construction Review

In a six-four en banc decision in Lighting Ballast Control LLC v. Philips Electronics North Am. Corp., a divided Federal Circuit confirmed its practice of de novo claim construction review. The main question arising from the...more

3/3/2014 - Claim Construction de novo standard of review Patent Litigation

Takeda Prevacid SoluTab Patent Valid, But Not Infringed

In Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. v. Zydus Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., the Federal Circuit reversed the district court’s finding that Zydus’s proposed generic product infringed Takeda’s Prevacid® SoluTab™ patent, but...more

2/25/2014 - Claim Construction Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents

Federal Circuit Issues Remand In Ten Year Reexamination Proceeding

In Tempo Lighting, Inc. v. Tivoli, LLC, the Federal Circuit vacated the decision of the U.S. Patent Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board that had reversed the Examiner’s rejection of most of the claims of the patent at issue....more

2/20/2014 - Inter Partes Reexamination Patent Litigation Patents Post-Grant Review Remand USPTO

Federal Circuit Holds Computer-Implemented Method Claims Invalid Under Section 101

Although SmartGene, Inc. v. Advanced Biological Laboratories, SA is a non-precedential Federal Circuit decision, it could be interesting for that very reason, if it is a reflection of what the court sees as settled aspects of...more

2/5/2014 - Computer-Related Inventions Patent Applications Patent Litigation Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Patents

41 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 2