Post-Grant Review

News & Analysis as of

IPR Spotlight Series: What to Do When the PTAB Denies Your Petition to Institute IPR

Inter partes review (IPR) before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) became available on September 16, 2012 as a post-grant review procedure to challenge the patentability of issued claims based on prior art patents and...more

Case Alert -- Federal Circuit Reverses District Court Denying Stay Pending Covered Business Method Review

On July 10, 2014, the Federal Circuit issued an opinion in VirtualAgility Inc. v. Salesforce.com, Inc., in which it reversed the district court’s order denying Salesforce’s motion to stay the district court suit pending...more

Challenging Prior Art Status In Post-Grant Proceedings

An inter partes review (“IPR”) proceeding allows a party to challenge the validity of a patent before the Patent Trial and Appeals Board (“PTAB”) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). In an IPR proceeding,...more

The Duty Of Candor: Letting The Truth Shine

“Three things cannot hide for long: the Moon, the Sun, and the Truth.” The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) relies on the truth coming to light to resolve disputes in post-grant proceedings in a “just, speedy, and...more

Federal Circuit Orders Stay Pending Completion of CBM Review

Applying section 18(a)(1) of the America Invents Act (AIA) to an issue of first impression, a divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a district court, ordering a stay of the district court...more

IP Buzz - June 2014

In this issue: - Patent Reform: It's Alive! - Nautilus: New Test, Same Application? - Supreme Court Opens Door to Food and Beverage Label Challenges Under Lanham Act - Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank:...more

Advertising News & Analysis - June 2014 #4

In this issue: - Want to Settle an NAD Challenge? It Can be Done - California "Made in USA" Class Action May be First of Many - More Buzz About Post-Grant Proceedings - Excerpt from Want to...more

Docs @ BIO -- Federal District Court vs. the PTAB

Yesterday, BIO 2014 presented a session entitled "Navigating Patent Challenges Under the America Invents Act" during which the presenters analyzed the differences between patent challenges in Federal District Court and before...more

BIO International Convention 2014 Preview -- Part III: Post-Grant Patent Challenges and Biosimilar Regulatory Pathways

The 2014 BIO International Convention has already begun in San Diego, but most of the sessions and forums get underway beginning on Tuesday, June 24, 2014. Patent Docs has been highlighting a few sessions or other...more

IP Buzz - Post Grant Practice - June 2014

In this issue: - Terminal Disclaimer Cannot be Used to Circumvent IPR Review Standard - IPR Spotlight Series: Evaluating Whether to File a Preliminary Patent Owner Response - Unscathed by Review: Recent...more

What Australian companies need to know about ‘patent oppositions’ in the US

Many Australian companies will be familiar with the pre-grant patent oppositions that are available under Australian law. Similarly, many Australian companies will be familiar with post-grant patent oppositions before the...more

PTAB Denies Late Attempt to Alter the Applicable Claim Construction Standard in an IPR

A recent decision from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the “Board”) highlights the different claim construction standards that are ordinarily applicable in post-grant review proceedings and in district court, and...more

Federal Circuit Finds Consumer Watchdog Lacks Standing to Appeal Reexamination Decision Upholding WARF Stem Cell Patent

In Consumer Watchdog v. Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, the Federal Circuit held that an inter partes reexamination requester must establish an injury in fact sufficient to confer Article III standing in order to appeal...more

Post-Grant Report - May 2014: Playing Offense As A Defendant: Using Covered Business Method Review To Turn The Tables In Patent...

New patent infringement lawsuits fill the dockets every morning. The asserted patents are often directed to a process involving financial services or products, electronic commerce, or monetary matters. The patents may...more

Post-Grant Report - May 2014: The Scope Of Discovery In Inter Partes Review Proceedings

A significant difference in the new inter partes review (IPR) proceedings versus the previous inter partes and ex parte reexamination proceedings is the availability of discovery to both petitioners and patent owners in IPR...more

A Primer On Claim Amendments in Post-Grant Review

Bloomberg Inc. et al. v. Markets-Alert Pty Ltd. - In the final written decision of a covered business method (CBM) review, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) sided with the petitioner, canceling all claims under...more

Advertising News & Analysis - May 2014

In this issue: - Leave Your Claims at the Border - Delaware Suit Shows You Can’t Escheat the Tax Man - FDA Sets Limit on Fishy Omega-3 Nutrient Value Claims - Your Guide to Post-Grant Patent...more

IP Buzz - April 2014

In this issue: - Endo Pharmaceuticals v. Actavis: An Analysis from a Transactional Perspective - Supreme Court to Consider Federal Circuit De Novo Review of Claim Construction in Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc....more

Reasons to Think Twice Before Initiating Inter Partes Review

There has been a lot of hype about inter partes review – including by us – and for good reason. The pro-complainant bent of the rules is turning out to be pro-complainant in effect as well, at least when you look at the...more

Snapshot Overview of Options for Post-Issuance Challenges Before the PTAB

There are three available types of post-issuance challenges to the validity of a patent: (1) Inter Partes review; (2) Transitional Program for Covered Business Method Patents; and (3) Post-Grant Review. Another option not...more

Federal Circuit to Review PTAB Post-Grant Review Proceedings in SAP v. Versata: PTAB Jurisdiction; Grounds on Which Invalidity May...

On September 16, 2012, post-grant proceedings became available as means to challenge patent validity pursuant to the America Invents Act. The post-grant proceedings take place before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board...more

First AIA Roundtable Hints at More Conservative Approach to PTAB Review

On April 15, 2014, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) hosted the first in a series of eight scheduled roundtable discussions intended to share information about the new America Invents Act (“AIA”) trials, including...more

Cumulative Art Rejections v. Estoppel: Balancing Competing Interests In IPR Petitions

Inter Partes Review, or IPR, is one of the new procedures implemented through the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act that challenges a patent’s validity at the Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB) of the United States Patent...more

Stays Pending Inter Partes Review - New Strategies For The New Rules

As the Patent Trials and Appeals Board (“PTAB”) works through the first wave of filings under the new inter partes review (“IPR”) procedures, district courts are addressing an increasing volume of requests for stays pending...more

Enlarged Board of Appeal referral – Challenging clarity of post-grant amendments

Lack of clarity is not a ground for opposition before the EPO, but can be raised against amendments filed during the opposition proceedings. In accordance with Article 101(3) EPC, any amendments made to a granted patent...more

71 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 3