In borrowing a page from the '80s band "Men Without Hats," on June 12, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court brought greater certainty for both biosimilar applicants and originator companies. In Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc., the Supreme...more
7/19/2017
/ Amgen ,
Biosimilars ,
BPCIA ,
Commercial Marketing ,
Declaratory Relief ,
Notice Requirements ,
Patent Dance ,
Patent Infringement ,
Remedies ,
Sandoz ,
Sandoz v Amgen ,
SCOTUS ,
State Law Claims
In Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc., the Supreme Court brought greater certainty to two key issues relating to the “patent dance” under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA). First, the Court held that where a...more
6/13/2017
/ Amgen ,
Biologics ,
Biosimilars ,
BPCIA ,
Commercial Marketing ,
Declaratory Judgments ,
FDA Approval ,
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ,
Notice Requirements ,
Patent Dance ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patents ,
Pharmaceutical Patents ,
Preemption ,
Preliminary Injunctions ,
Sandoz ,
Sandoz v Amgen ,
SCOTUS ,
State Law Claims ,
Unfair Competition
The Federal Circuit on Tuesday ruled that the 180-day notice of commercial marketing provision of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) is a requirement for all biosimilar applicants regardless of whether...more
7/8/2016
/ Amgen ,
Apotex ,
Appeals ,
Biologics ,
Biosimilars ,
BPCIA ,
Commercial Marketing ,
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ,
Generic Drugs ,
Licensing Rules ,
Notice Requirements ,
Patent Dance ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patents ,
Pharmaceutical Patents ,
Preliminary Injunctions
Since August 2015, Amgen and Apotex have been locked in litigation in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida related to Apotex’s pegfilgrastim product, which is purported to be biosimilar to Amgen’s...more
On August 6, 2015, Amgen sued Apotex in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida for patent infringement related to Apotex’s pegfilgrastim product, which is purported to be biosimilar to Neulasta®. What is...more
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit yesterday heard oral arguments on the applicability and interpretation of two key provisions of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA). Briefly, oral argument...more
6/5/2015
/ Amgen ,
Appeals ,
Biosimilars ,
BPCIA ,
Commercial Marketing ,
Exclusive Remedy ,
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ,
Notice Requirements ,
Oral Argument ,
Sandoz ,
Sandoz v Amgen ,
Statutory Interpretation
On March 19, 2015, Judge Seeborg of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California denied Amgen Inc.’s motion for a preliminary injunction in the Amgen v. Sandoz case, thereby removing one more...more
3/23/2015
/ Amgen ,
Biologics ,
BPCIA ,
Commercial Marketing ,
Conversion ,
Dismissals ,
FDA Approval ,
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ,
Notice Requirements ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patents ,
Preemption ,
Preliminary Injunctions ,
Sandoz ,
Sandoz v Amgen ,
Unfair Competition