Inherent in a trustee’s discretionary authority to make a distribution of trust property outright and free of trust to a permissible beneficiary of the trust may well be the authority to distribute the property instead to another trustee for the benefit of that beneficiary. That is the essence of the concept of “decanting” in the trust context. In recent years, a number of state legislatures (U.S.) have seen fit to codify the concept. Massachusetts has not. No need. On July 29, 2013, its Supreme Judicial Court found that a trustee of a certain discretionary trust had implied common law decanting authority: “We regard this broad grant of almost unlimited discretion as evidence of the settlor’s intent that the disinterested trustee have the authority to distribute assets in further trust for the beneficiaries’ benefit.” Morse v. Kraft, 2013 WL 3853152 (Mass.)). Charles E. Rounds, Jr., in §220.127.116.11(a) of Loring and Rounds: A Trustee’s Handbook (2013), questions the wisdom of barnicalizing by statute this very simple equity-based concept. The relevant portions of the section are reproduced below.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Topics: Beneficiaries, Decanting, Nuisance, Trusts
Published In: Administrative Agency Updates, Conflict of Laws Updates, Family Law Updates, Tax Updates, Wills, Trusts, & Estate Planning Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Charles E. Rounds, Jr., Suffolk University Law School | Attorney Advertising