Knobbe Martens

Contact
Share
Info
2040 Main Street
14th Floor
Irvine, CA 92614, United States
Phone: (949) 760-0404
Fax: (949) 760-9502
Areas of Practice
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
Locations
Other U.S. Locations
  • California
  • D.C.
  • New York
  • Washington
Number of Attorneys
100+ Attorneys

Boston Scientific closes acquisition of TAVI device company, Symetis

On March 30, 2017, Boston Scientific announced an agreement to acquire Symetis SA, a privately-held Swiss company focused on minimally-invasive transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) devices, for $435 million in cash…more

Acquisitions, Boston Scientific, Innovation, Medical Devices, Technology

See all updates »

Federal Circuit Rules on Biosimilar Notice Requirement

Biosimilar Applicants Must Provide Notice of Commercial Launch: What You Need To Know - Case Background - In an opinion released today in Amgen v. Apotex, the Federal Circuit held biosimilar applicants who…more

Amgen, Apotex, Appeals, Biologics, Biosimilars

See all updates »

Is Brexit an IP Exit?

Voters in the U.K. recently passed a referendum paving the way for the U.K. to leave the European Union (EU). In response, British Prime Minister David Cameron resigned on Wednesday, July 13, 2016, with Theresa May as his…more

Article 50 Treaty of the EU, community, Community Designs, EU, European Patent Office

See all updates »

Will Courts Consider Evidence of Patent Eligibility?

Patent enforcement by Texas-based DataTreasury Corp. (“DataTreasury”) was a key motivation for the creation of Covered Business Method Review (“CBM”) proceedings. Senator Charles Schumer of New York, referring to DataTreasury,…more

Abstract Ideas, Admissible Evidence, America Invents Act, Claim Limitations, Covered Business Method Proceedings

See all updates »

Ex Parte Hafner Provides Clarity in Assessing Patent Subject Matter Eligibility for Software Patents

In Ex Parte Hafner, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the “Board”) reversed the Examiner’s rejection that claims directed to an energy transaction plan were subject-matter ineligible. Ex parte…more

Administrative Appeals, AIPLA, CLS Bank v Alice Corp, Ex Parte, Patent Examinations

See all updates »

Trump Administration Policy Statement Calls for FDA Premarketing Activities to be Funded Entirely by Industry Fees

The Trump White House released a Statement of Administration Policy on Wednesday in response to the House of Representatives’ passage of H.R. 2430, a bill that would reauthorize the use of four FDA user fee programs: the…more

Biosimilars, FDA, GDUFA, Innovation, Medical Device User Fee Program (MDUFA IV)

See all updates »

PTAB Grants-in-Part Rare Motion to Amend Based on Unexpected Results

The PTAB granted-in-part a patent owner’s motion to substitute claims based on evidence of secondary considerations of nonobviousness in Valeo North America, Inc. v. Schaeffler Technologies, AG & CO. KG, IPR2016-00502, Paper 37,…more

Evidence, Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding, Motion to Amend, Nonobvious, Patent Trial and Appeal Board

See all updates »

7 Intellectual Property Mistakes Startup Entrepreneurs Often Make

What’s the biggest mistake startup entrepreneurs make with respect to their intellectual property, and what can they do to fix it? That’s the question we recently put to IP attorneys writing on JD Supra, knowing that the…more

Business Formation, Copyright, First-to-File, Legal Perspectives, Patents

See all updates »

How Does the Supreme Court’s Recent Ruling on Incontinence Products Spill Over into Fashion?

On March 21, 2017 the Supreme Court issued a monumental holding removing the availability of laches as a defense in a claim for damages under patent infringement. The case changes decades of legal precedent, and adopts reasoning…more

Copyright, Copyright Infringement, Damages, Defense Strategies, Design Patent

See all updates »

Supreme Court Affirms Broader Claim Construction Standard in IPRs

PTAB’s Institution Decision Remains Largely Unreviewable - What You Need To Know - Summary - In its first case addressing an Inter Partes Review (“IPR”), the Supreme Court’s In re Cuozzo decision unanimously…more

America Invents Act, Appeals, Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Standard, Claim Construction, Cuozzo Speed Technologies v Lee

See all updates »

Federal Circuit Rules for The Medicines Company in Patent Litigation

In an en banc decision on July 12, 2016 in The Medicines Co. v. Hospira, Inc., the Federal Circuit established the circumstances under which a product manufactured according to product-by-process claims is invalid under the “on…more

Appeals, Commercial Marketing, Commercial Offer for Sale, Medco Health Solutions, On-Sale Bar

See all updates »

Melinta Therapeutics Receives FDA Approval for Baxdela in Skin Infections

On June 19, 2017, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the use of the fluoroquinolone antibiotic, Baxdela® (delafloxacin), for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). Approval of…more

FDA Approval, Pharmaceutical Industry, Prescription Drugs

See all updates »

Protecting and Enforcing your High Technology Intellectual Property

In This Presentation: - Software Patents Issues in the USPTO - Functional Claiming in Software Patents - Covered Business Method (CBM) Review - Will the Supreme Court kill all software patents this term? -…more

Covered Business Method Patents, Patent Applications, Patent Reform, Patents, Technology

See all updates »

Freedom to Operate and the Use of AIA Review

Freedom to Operate: •Identifying infringement risk •Third party patent (infringement) – claim searching –Timing •Discrete, continuous –Searching •In-house, search agency –Screening/analyzing •Ranking…more

Administrative Proceedings, America Invents Act, Defense Strategies, Germany, Intellectual Property Litigation

See all updates »

Philips Acquires EGI

Philips recently announced that it will purchase Electrical Geodesics, Inc. (EGI). The total value of the deal is estimated to be GBP 29.0 million (approximately $36.9 million). According to its website, EGI designs, develops,…more

Acquisitions, Medical Devices

See all updates »

Settlement 5 Days Before Final Written Decision Deadline Results in Termination Of IPR

In an order issued in Petroleum Geo-Services Inc. v. Westerngeco LLC, IPR2016-00407, IPR2016-00499, Paper 29 (P.TA.B. Jul. 5, 2017), the PTAB terminated the proceedings after the parties indicated that they had settled their…more

Final Written Decisions, Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding, Motion to Terminate, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patents

See all updates »

PTAB Holds Orthophoenix Patent Claims Invalid

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the “Board”) recently issued Final Written Decisions in two inter partes reviews filed by Stryker Corporation regarding two related Orthophoenix, LLC patents – U.S. Patent Nos. 7,153,307 (the…more

Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding, Medical Devices, Patent Infringement, Patent Invalidity, Patent Trial and Appeal Board

See all updates »

USPTO Creates New Alternative For Responding to Final Rejections

The new Post-Prosecution Pilot ("P3") program provides a pathway for patent applicants to make an in-person presentation to a panel of patent examiners as an alternative to existing options for responding to final rejections…more

Administrative Proceedings, Examiners, Patent Applications, Patents, USPTO

See all updates »

How Technical Must an Improvement be to Survive 101?

The technical nature of a claimed improvement is central to the evaluation of claims under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Two recent district court opinions illustrate that whether or not the claims describe an improvement in the functioning…more

Abstract Ideas, CLS Bank v Alice Corp, Computer-Related Inventions, Patent Validity, Patent-Eligible Subject Matter

See all updates »

Philips Buys RespirTech for Undisclosed Amount

Dutch conglomerate Philips recently announced that it will purchase Respiratory Technologies Inc. (RespirTech). According to its website, RespirTech describes itself as a St. Paul, Minnesota-based provider of inCourage vests,…more

Acquisitions, Health Information Technologies, Medical Devices

See all updates »

A Compelling Invention Story May Support Patent-Eligibility

The Mayo/Alice two-step patent-eligibility framework focuses on the patent claims. Nevertheless, recent Federal Circuit decisions have relied on patent specification statements to support holdings that the claims are…more

Claim Construction, CLS Bank v Alice Corp, Computer-Related Inventions, Mayo v. Prometheus, Patent-Eligible Subject Matter

See all updates »

PTAB Finds Claims Directed to an MRI Machine Patent-Ineligible

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) recently held in Ex parte Itagaki and Nishiara (PTAB 2016) that claims reciting a magnetic resonance imaging apparatus are directed to ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101…more

Computer-Related Inventions, Patent Applications, Patent Ownership, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent-Eligible Subject Matter

See all updates »

Will Courts Consider Evidence of Patent Eligibility?

Patent enforcement by Texas-based DataTreasury Corp. (“DataTreasury”) was a key motivation for the creation of Covered Business Method Review (“CBM”) proceedings. Senator Charles Schumer of New York, referring to DataTreasury,…more

Abstract Ideas, Admissible Evidence, America Invents Act, Claim Limitations, Covered Business Method Proceedings

See all updates »

Federal Circuit Affirms Obviousness of Novartis’s Patent for Multiple Sclerosis Drug

The Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB’s final written decision holding that claims directed to Novartis’s multiple sclerosis drug Gilenya were obvious in Novartis AG v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals. Ltd., No. 2016-1352 (Fed. Cir…more

Administrative Procedure Act, Appeals, Final Written Decisions, Novartis, Obviousness

See all updates »

Copyright exhaustion in the US: what the Kirtsaeng and ReDigi decisions tell us about the future of the first sale doctrine and secondary markets for copyrighted goods

The concept of copyright ‘exhaustion’, or the ‘first sale’ doctrine, refers to the principle that once a copyright owner places a copyrighted item in the stream of commerce by selling it, they have exhausted their exclusive…more

Capitol Records, Copyright, Digital Goods, First Sale Doctrine, Grey Market

See all updates »

Orphan Drug Designation

“Orphan drug” is a designation given to certain pharmaceutical and biological products (drugs) that would likely not be developed due to a relatively small patient population and limited potential for profitability. In the…more

Biologics, Clinical Trials, FDA Approval, Orphan Drugs, Pharmaceutical Industry

See all updates »

Janssen Biologic Tremfya Secures FDA Approval Following Use of Priority Review Voucher

On July 13, 2017, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved Tremfya (guselkumab), a biologic manufactured by Janssen Biotech, for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis patients who are candidates for systemic…more

FDA Approval, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Pharmaceutical Patents, Priority Review Vouchers

See all updates »

Federal Circuit Upholds IPR Decision of Unpatentability in Skky v. MindGeek

The Federal Circuit upheld an IPR final written decision by the PTAB holding that MindGeek’s claims were unpatentable in Skky, Inc. v. MindGeek, S.A.R.L., No. 2016-2018 (Fed. Cir. June 7, 2017)…more

Appeals, Final Written Decisions, Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding, Means-Plus-Function, Obviousness

See all updates »

USPTO Creates New Alternative For Responding to Final Rejections

The new Post-Prosecution Pilot ("P3") program provides a pathway for patent applicants to make an in-person presentation to a panel of patent examiners as an alternative to existing options for responding to final rejections…more

Administrative Proceedings, Examiners, Patent Applications, Patents, USPTO

See all updates »

Supreme Court Eases Rules for Larger Patent Damage Awards

In a unanimous decision yesterday, the Supreme Court eliminated the requirement that patentees must show that an infringer was objectively reckless in order to obtain enhanced patent damages. The decision returned to the…more

35 U.S.C. § 284, Abuse of Discretion, Enhanced Damages, Halo v Pulse, Judicial Discretion

See all updates »

Federal Circuit Affirms Toshiba Win against NPE

On April 25, 2016, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the judgment of invalidity on two patents in favor of Knobbe Martens client Toshiba Corporation..…more

Patent Infringement, Patent Invalidity, Patent Litigation, Patents, Toshiba

See all updates »

The U.S. Supreme Court’s Increasing Involvement In Patent Law

In 1982, the U.S. congress formed a new specialised appeals court, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, or “CAFC,” and transferred responsibility for patent appeals from the various regional courts of appeal to this new…more

Appeals, Attorney's Fees, CAFC, CLS Bank v Alice Corp, Nautilus Inc. v. Biosig Instruments

See all updates »

FDA Issues Proposed Guidance for Changes to Medical Device Software

The U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) issued a proposed guidance on August 8, 2016, regarding software changes to medical devices. The proposed guidance relates to requirements for submitting medical device software changes…more

510(k) RTA, Draft Guidance, FDA, Medical Devices, Modification

See all updates »

MedPlast Completes Acquisition of Vention Medical

MedPlast, Inc. recently announced that it has completed its acquisition of Vention Medical‘s device manufacturing services arm. The press release states that the acquisition “broadens MedPlast’s manufacturing capabilities and…more

Acquisitions, Medical Devices

See all updates »

Why is Intellectual Property Important?

In This Presentation: - Intellectual Property (IP): •Refers to a category of exclusive rights created by statute, including: –Copyrights –Trademarks –Trade Secrets –Utility Patents –Design…more

Copyright, Design Patent, Patents, Trade Dress, Trade Secrets

See all updates »

Federal Circuit Rules for The Medicines Company in Patent Litigation

In an en banc decision on July 12, 2016 in The Medicines Co. v. Hospira, Inc., the Federal Circuit established the circumstances under which a product manufactured according to product-by-process claims is invalid under the “on…more

Appeals, Commercial Marketing, Commercial Offer for Sale, Medco Health Solutions, On-Sale Bar

See all updates »

Supreme Court Will Not Review Pay-For-Delay Case over GSK’s Lamictal

On November 7, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to review an appeal from a Third Circuit decision finding that a settlement between GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (Teva) involving the…more

Anti-Competitive, Antitrust Violations, Appeals, Denial of Certiorari, FTC v Actavis

See all updates »

INC Research Merges with inVentiv Health Creating a $7.4B Combined Entity

According to press releases, INC Research Holdings, Inc. has agreed to merge with inVentiv Health, creating a combined company having an enterprise value of approximately $7.4 billion. The press release further notes that the…more

Biopharmaceutical, Cybersecurity, Good Clinical Practices, Medical Devices, Mergers

See all updates »

Analogous Analysis: A Survey of Recent PTAB Decisions Establishing Subject Matter Patent Eligibility

In 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court established the current framework for determining patent-eligible subject matter in Alice. The Alice framework is a two-part test, with step one requiring a determination regarding whether a claim…more

Abstract Ideas, CLS Bank v Alice Corp, Computer-Related Inventions, DDR Holdings v Hotels.com, Enfish v Microsoft

See all updates »

PTAB Not Barred from Using Patent Owner Submissions as a Basis for Holding Claims Unpatentable

The Federal Circuit vacated and remanded the PTAB’s final written decision holding that claims directed to steel making methods were obvious in Rovalma, S.A. v. Bohler-Edelstahl GmbH & Co. KG, No. 2016-2233 (Fed. Cir. May 11,…more

Appeals, Claim Construction, Final Written Decisions, Obviousness, Patent Trial and Appeal Board

See all updates »

How Does the Supreme Court’s Recent Ruling on Incontinence Products Spill Over into Fashion?

On March 21, 2017 the Supreme Court issued a monumental holding removing the availability of laches as a defense in a claim for damages under patent infringement. The case changes decades of legal precedent, and adopts reasoning…more

Copyright, Copyright Infringement, Damages, Defense Strategies, Design Patent

See all updates »

New Video Resources on Inter Partes Review (IPRs)

Since 2012, Inter Partes Review (“IPR”) has emerged as one of the most significant new procedures in patent law. An IPR is a proceeding in the Patent Office, and allows a party to challenge an issued patent on certain prior art…more

Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding, Medical Devices, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patents

See all updates »

Olympus Sued Over “Superbug” Infections

The New York Times recently reported that 179 patients at the UCLA Ronald Reagan Medical Center were exposed to a potentially deadly “superbug” between October of 2014 and January of 2015. As of February 18, the infection of…more

CDC, Hospitals, Infections, Medical Devices, UCLA Medical Center

See all updates »

Easyweb v. Twitter and the Rise of the Non-Precedential Opinion

In a non-precedential opinion, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s ruling that the claims at issue in Easyweb Innovations, LLC. v. Twitter, Inc. (“Easyweb”) were directed to patent-ineligible subject matter...…more

Abstract Ideas, Appeals, CLS Bank v Alice Corp, Mayo v. Prometheus, Patent Litigation

See all updates »

Supreme Court Will Decide Whether IPRs Are Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court granted a petition for writ of certiorari to address whether inter partes review – an adversarial process used by the Patent Office to determine the validity of existing patents – is unconstitutional in Oil…more

Administrative Proceedings, America Invents Act, Appeals, Article III, Certiorari

See all updates »

Medtronic's Recent Interactions with the FDA

It has been a busy couple of months between Medtronic and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), with Medtronic experiencing both recalls and approvals from the government agency. Below is a brief summary of some recent of…more

FDA, FDA Approval, Medical Devices, Medical Software, Medtronic

See all updates »

Johnson & Johnson to Acquire Abbott Medical Optics

Johnson & Johnson recently announced an agreement to acquire Abbott Medical Optics for $4.325 billion. Abbot Medical Optics, a subsidiary of Abbot Laboratories, reported $1.1 billion in sales in 2015. According to the press…more

Acquisitions, Johnson & Johnson, Medical Devices, Popular

See all updates »

Federal Circuit Finds Claims Directed to Encoding and Decoding Image Data Patent-Ineligible

The Federal Circuit recently held in RecogniCorp, LLC v. Nintendo Co., Ltd. (Fed. Cir. 2016) that claims directed to encoding and decoding image data were not patent-eligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101. This ruling further highlights…more

Abstract Ideas, Appeals, CLS Bank v Alice Corp, McRo v Bandai Namco, Patent-Eligible Subject Matter

See all updates »

The Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 - New Federal Protection for Trade Secrets | Orange County Business Journal Intellectual Property Supplement

On May 11, 2016, the President signed into law the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA). The DTSA significantly expands protection of intellectual property rights by creating a body of trade secrets law that applies nationwide and by…more

Asset Seizure, Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA), Ex Parte, Federal v State Law Application, Intellectual Property Protection

See all updates »

Federal Circuit Finds That Fetal Diagnosis Claims Survive Written Description Attacks

Stanford University v. The Chinese University of Hong Kong. Federal Circuit Appeal No. 2015-2011. Decided June 27, 2017. In an appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), the Federal Circuit held that claims related…more

Appeals, Diagnostic Tests, Evidence, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Validity

See all updates »

In Helsinn Healthcare, the Federal Circuit Offers Guidance on the On-Sale Bar under the AIA

The sale of a product prior to filing a patent application, or “on-sale bar,” has long been a potential barrier to obtaining a patent in the United States. Especially in the biotechnology space, which can involve a long…more

America Invents Act, Biotechnology, On-Sale Bar, Patent Applications, Patent Validity

See all updates »

Federal Circuit Affirms PTAB’s Obviousness Holding for Novartis’s Dementia Drug Patents

The Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB’s final written decisions holding that claims directed to Novartis’s dementia drug compositions containing Exelon were obvious in Novartis AG v. Noven Pharm. Inc., No. 2016-1679 (Fed. Cir…more

Appeals, Burden of Proof, Clear and Convincing Evidence, Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding, Novartis

See all updates »

Can’t Say “I Ain’t Mad At Cha” for Copying Me

On June 1, 2017, noted music and fashion photographer Danny Clinch filed suit in the Southern District of New York in connection with the use of two photographs of famed rapper Tupac Shukar (“Tupac”) on t-shirts. The defendants…more

Accounting, Celebrities, Copyright, Copyright Infringement, Damages

See all updates »

New York City Makes a Push to Become a Life Sciences Hotspot

New York City took a step toward its goal of becoming a life sciences hub with a $5 million grant from the mayor’s office to BioLabs@NYULangone, a biotech incubator in Manhattan formed from a collaboration between BioLabs and…more

Biotechnology, Grants, Life Sciences, Mayor di Blasio, Startups

See all updates »

Federal Circuit Reverses-in-Part PTAB’s IPR Decisions for Wasica’s Tire Pressure Monitoring Patents

The Federal Circuit affirmed-in-part and reversed-in-part the PTAB’s final written decisions on Wasica’s tire pressure monitoring patents in Wasica Finance GmbH v. Continental Automotive Sys., Inc., No. 2015-2078 (Fed. Cir. Apr…more

Appeals, Claim Construction, Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Validity

See all updates »

MRI-Compatible Robot Aims to Improve Breast Cancer Biopsies

The University of Twente in Enschede, Netherlands recently introduced “the world’s smallest and most accurate 3D-printed biopsy robot,” called the Stormram 4. The device is designed to carry out biopsies during breast cancer…more

3D Printing, Medical Devices, Robotic Surgery, Robotics

See all updates »

AIPLA Legislative Proposal to Overrule Recent §101 Caselaw

With the continuing uncertainties regarding application of the subject matter eligibility standard enumerated in 35 U.S.C. §101 by both courts and the U.S. Patent Office, organizations that have an interest in clarifying the law…more

AIPLA, CLS Bank v Alice Corp, Innovation, Intellectual Property Owner’s Association (IPO), Patent-Eligible Subject Matter

See all updates »

Statements Made in an IPR Can Lead to Prosecution Disclaimer

The Federal Circuit held that statements made by a patent owner in an IPR, whether before or after institution, can be considered during claim construction in district court litigation and relied upon to support a finding of…more

Appeals, Apple, Claim Construction, Doctrine of Prosecution Disclaimer, Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding

See all updates »

Here’s Another Fine Mess You’ve Gotten Me Into: Best Practices for Employee, Contractor and Consulting Agreements.

In This Presentation: Overview of Messes to Avoid: • Split Ownership • Agreements to Agree • Agreements with Unclear/Improper: – relation to prior agreements – term – royalty rate – execution •…more

Contract Terms, Copyright, Intellectual Property Litigation, Intellectual Property Protection, Inventors

See all updates »

Boston Scientific Announces Acquisition of Symetis for $435 Million

Boston Scientific Corporation recently announced an agreement to purchase Swiss medical device maker Symetis SA for $435 million in up-front cash.  The acquisition is expected to close in the second quarter of 2017…more

Acquisitions, Boston Scientific, Medical Devices

See all updates »

Developments in IPR Remands from the Federal Circuit During the First Half of 2017

Previously, we reported the outcomes of remands from the Federal Circuit to the PTAB in IPR cases through 2016.... This note is an update to that report, surveying the outcomes and status of remands to the PTAB in the first…more

Anticipation, Appeals, Final Written Decisions, Incorporated by Reference, Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding

See all updates »

FDA Will Hold Hearing on Communications Regarding Unapproved Uses

The Food and Drug Administration has issued a notice announcing a public hearing on November 9 & 10, 2016 to gather input relating to companies’ communications about their medical products, with a particular focus on…more

FDA, Medical Devices, PHRMA, Public Comment

See all updates »

FDA Approves Final Label for Syndros™

On May 24, 2017, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the final label for Syndros™ (dronabinol) oral solution, a Schedule II (CII) controlled substance. Syndros™ was initially approved by the FDA on July 5, 2016 for…more

Controlled Substances, FDA Approval, Medical Marijuana, Pharmaceutical Industry, Prescription Drugs

See all updates »

Analogous Analysis: A Survey of Recent PTAB Decisions Establishing Subject Matter Patent Eligibility

In 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court established the current framework for determining patent-eligible subject matter in Alice. The Alice framework is a two-part test, with step one requiring a determination regarding whether a claim…more

Abstract Ideas, CLS Bank v Alice Corp, Computer-Related Inventions, DDR Holdings v Hotels.com, Enfish v Microsoft

See all updates »

U.S. Congress Creates Federal Cause of Action for Trade Secret Misappropriation

For the first time in this nation’s history, the U.S. will have a federal trade secrets law that allows private citizens to enforce their trade secrets and sue for damages. On Wednesday, April 27, 2016, the U.S. House of…more

Asset Seizure, Damages, Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA), Ex Parte, Injunctions

See all updates »

What the *TM*?!?! The Disparagement Clause has been Bleeped.

Trademark law is an important form of protection for the fashion and beauty industry. It protects both brand owners and consumers by regulating the registration of brands, or source identifiers, of fashion and beauty products. …more

Disparagement, Fashion Branding, Fashion Industry, First Amendment, Free Speech

See all updates »

Medical Device Update

In This Presentation: • Medical device patent statistics • Non-practicing entity (NPE) litigation • Inter partes reexam (IPR) update • Important litigation – Edwards v. Medtronic – Masimo v. Philips –…more

Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding, Medical Devices, Non-Practicing Entities, Patent Infringement, Patent Litigation

See all updates »

Easyweb v. Twitter and the Rise of the Non-Precedential Opinion

In a non-precedential opinion, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s ruling that the claims at issue in Easyweb Innovations, LLC. v. Twitter, Inc. (“Easyweb”) were directed to patent-ineligible subject matter...…more

Abstract Ideas, Appeals, CLS Bank v Alice Corp, Mayo v. Prometheus, Patent Litigation

See all updates »

Recent Developments in Patent Law for Medical Device Companies

In This Presentation: - Recent Patent Cases From The Supreme Court - Medical Device Patent Statistics and Cases - USPTO Post-Grant Proceedings: Lessons Learned After Two Years - Excerpt from Recent Cases…more

America Invents Act, CLS Bank v Alice Corp, DePuy, Exceptional Case, Medical Devices

See all updates »

Federal Circuit Affirms Obviousness of Novartis’s Patent for Multiple Sclerosis Drug

The Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB’s final written decision holding that claims directed to Novartis’s multiple sclerosis drug Gilenya were obvious in Novartis AG v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals. Ltd., No. 2016-1352 (Fed. Cir…more

Administrative Procedure Act, Appeals, Final Written Decisions, Novartis, Obviousness

See all updates »

Puma Treads New Territory Hitting Forever 21 with Copyright Allegations after the Supreme Court’s Star Athletica Decision

On March 31, 2017, Forever 21 was sued by Puma over its “Fenty” line of shoes. The “Fenty” label has become popular, in part, due to the influence of music artist, Rihanna as the label’s brand ambassador. In its complaint,…more

Copyright Infringement, Design Patent, Forever 21, Originality, Patent Infringement

See all updates »

Revenge of the Present Invention

Patentees suing alleged infringers have learned from a long history of federal district court and Federal Circuit rulings that (paraphrasing the Miranda warning given to criminal suspects) “anything you say [in the patent or…more

Inventions, Patent Applications, Patent Infringement, Patent Litigation, Patent-Eligible Subject Matter

See all updates »

Janssen Biologic Tremfya Secures FDA Approval Following Use of Priority Review Voucher

On July 13, 2017, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved Tremfya (guselkumab), a biologic manufactured by Janssen Biotech, for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis patients who are candidates for systemic…more

FDA Approval, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Pharmaceutical Patents, Priority Review Vouchers

See all updates »

AIPLA Legislative Proposal to Overrule Recent §101 Caselaw

With the continuing uncertainties regarding application of the subject matter eligibility standard enumerated in 35 U.S.C. §101 by both courts and the U.S. Patent Office, organizations that have an interest in clarifying the law…more

AIPLA, CLS Bank v Alice Corp, Innovation, Intellectual Property Owner’s Association (IPO), Patent-Eligible Subject Matter

See all updates »

U.S. Supreme Court Eliminates Laches Defense for Damages in Patent Suits

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday, March 21, 2017, held in a 7-1 decision that the defense of laches is not available under the Patent Act to bar claims for damages. SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag v. First Quality Baby…more

Appeals, Copyright, Damages, Defense Strategies, Equitable Estoppel

See all updates »

Janssen and Celltrion: Remicade Biosimilar Patent Dance

Janssen Biotech Inc. and Celltrion Healthcare have taken the next step over Janssen’s blockbuster arthritis biologic medicine Remicade (infliximab) and Celltrion’s biosimilar, as required by the Biologics Price Competition and…more

Biologics, Biosimilars, BPCIA, Celltrion, Good Faith

See all updates »

Janssen and Celltrion: Remicade Biosimilar Patent Dance

Janssen Biotech Inc. and Celltrion Healthcare have taken the next step over Janssen’s blockbuster arthritis biologic medicine Remicade (infliximab) and Celltrion’s biosimilar, as required by the Biologics Price Competition and…more

Biologics, Biosimilars, BPCIA, Celltrion, Good Faith

See all updates »

How to Pull Off the Great Balancing Act | Law Practice Today

Maintaining a healthy balance between work and personal life can be challenging in any career. With the demanding workflow that comes with being a lawyer finding a balance can often prove to be even more challenging. However,…more

Professional Development, Young Lawyers

See all updates »

Federal Circuit Review - June 2017

Inter Partes Reexamination Estoppel Attaches On Claim-by-Claim Basis for New Requests and Pending Proceedings - In In re Affinity Labs Of Texas, LLC, Appeal Nos. 2016-1092, 2016-1172, the Federal Circuit held that the…more

Appeals, Breach of Contract, Claim Construction, Doctrine of Prosecution Disclaimer, Estoppel

See all updates »

Activity Trackers Eye Inactivity Tracking

Fitbit recently announced plans to build sleep apnea diagnostics into its wrist-worn activity tracking devices, stating that it expects do so within a year.  If successful, Fitbit may be able to address a market that is expected…more

FDA, Fitbit, Medical Devices, Tracking Systems, Wearable Technology

See all updates »

Have You Been Duped?

In the fashion and beauty world, the copying of higher-priced brands is widespread. While in fashion, the term for copies of designer products is “knockoffs,” in beauty, the term is “dupes.” Whether it is a colloquial use of the…more

Acquired Distinctiveness, Fashion Branding, Fashion Design, Fashion Industry, Trade Dress

See all updates »

Knobbe Martens Client Nomadix Prevails On Summary Judgment

On January 27, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California granted summary judgment in favor of Nomadix, Inc., ruling that competitor Blueprint RF infringes Nomadix’s patented Internet-access technology. The…more

Intellectual Property Protection, Patent Infringement, Patent Litigation, Patent Validity, Summary Judgment

See all updates »

Gunn v. Minton: The Supreme Court's Correction of the Federal Circuit's Overly Broad Assertion of Jurisdiction Over State-Law Claims

For nearly two decades, the Federal Circuit has applied a lenient standard for federal jurisdiction that routinely sweeps state law claims into the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts merely because the claims require…more

Attorney Malpractice, Certiorari, Gunn v Minton, Jurisdiction, Patents

See all updates »

Federal Circuit Review - June 2017

Inter Partes Reexamination Estoppel Attaches On Claim-by-Claim Basis for New Requests and Pending Proceedings - In In re Affinity Labs Of Texas, LLC, Appeal Nos. 2016-1092, 2016-1172, the Federal Circuit held that the…more

Appeals, Breach of Contract, Claim Construction, Doctrine of Prosecution Disclaimer, Estoppel

See all updates »

The PTAB Grants the University of Minnesota Sovereign Immunity but does not Terminate IPR

The PTAB has again addressed sovereign immunity in the context of an IPR. Reactive Surfaces, LTD. petitioned for IPR of U.S. Patents No. 8,394,618 and 8,252,571. The ’618 and ’571 patents are co-owned by Toyota Motor…more

Administrative Proceedings, Eleventh Amendment, Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding, Motion to Dismiss, Patent Trial and Appeal Board

See all updates »

Appealing Medical Device Patent Cases

Medical device patent infringement cases, like all patent infringement cases, must be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C. People often refer to this Court as the “Federal Circuit.” …more

Appeals, Medical Devices, Patent Infringement, Patent Litigation, Patents

See all updates »

Becton Dickinson to Acquire C. R. Bard for $24 Billion

Becton Dickinson (“BD”) recently announced an agreement to acquire C.R. Bard for $24 billion in cash and stock. The transaction remains subject to regulatory and shareholder approvals, but is expected to close in the fall of…more

Acquisitions, Life Sciences, Medical Devices

See all updates »

Medical Device Update

In This Presentation: • Medical device patent statistics • Non-practicing entity (NPE) litigation • Inter partes reexam (IPR) update • Important litigation – Edwards v. Medtronic – Masimo v. Philips –…more

Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding, Medical Devices, Non-Practicing Entities, Patent Infringement, Patent Litigation

See all updates »

Federal Circuit Rules for The Medicines Company in Patent Litigation

In an en banc decision on July 12, 2016 in The Medicines Co. v. Hospira, Inc., the Federal Circuit established the circumstances under which a product manufactured according to product-by-process claims is invalid under the “on…more

Appeals, Commercial Marketing, Commercial Offer for Sale, Medco Health Solutions, On-Sale Bar

See all updates »

Knobbe Martens Client Nomadix Prevails On Summary Judgment

On January 27, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California granted summary judgment in favor of Nomadix, Inc., ruling that competitor Blueprint RF infringes Nomadix’s patented Internet-access technology. The…more

Intellectual Property Protection, Patent Infringement, Patent Litigation, Patent Validity, Summary Judgment

See all updates »

Multi-level Encryption Patent Survives § 101 Challenge in District Court

On May 23, 2017, the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (“District Court”) denied a motion for summary judgment that the patent claims asserted in a lawsuit brought by TecSec, Inc. (“TecSec”) are invalid under…more

Abstract Ideas, Encryption, Motion for Summary Judgment, Patent Invalidity, Patent-Eligible Subject Matter

See all updates »

Ex Parte Hafner Provides Clarity in Assessing Patent Subject Matter Eligibility for Software Patents

In Ex Parte Hafner, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the “Board”) reversed the Examiner’s rejection that claims directed to an energy transaction plan were subject-matter ineligible. Ex parte…more

Administrative Appeals, AIPLA, CLS Bank v Alice Corp, Ex Parte, Patent Examinations

See all updates »

FDA Approves Expanded Use of Small Molecule Drug Kalydeco on the Basis of In Vitro Data

On May 17, 2017, Vertex Pharmaceuticals small molecule drug Kalydeco® (ivacaftor) was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in treating an expanded population of cystic fibrosis patients with particular…more

FDA Approval, Pharmaceutical Industry, Prescription Drugs

See all updates »

Federal Circuit Rules on Biosimilar Notice Requirement

Biosimilar Applicants Must Provide Notice of Commercial Launch: What You Need To Know - Case Background - In an opinion released today in Amgen v. Apotex, the Federal Circuit held biosimilar applicants who…more

Amgen, Apotex, Appeals, Biologics, Biosimilars

See all updates »

PTAB Denies Apple's Motion to Withdraw IPR Petition and Motion for Joinder

The PTAB denied Apple’s motion to withdraw both its IPR petition and concurrent motion for joinder to prevent Apple from circumventing potential estoppel ramifications in Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG,…more

Apple, Estoppel, Final Written Decisions, Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding, Joinder

See all updates »

USPTO Creates New Alternative For Responding to Final Rejections

The new Post-Prosecution Pilot ("P3") program provides a pathway for patent applicants to make an in-person presentation to a panel of patent examiners as an alternative to existing options for responding to final rejections…more

Administrative Proceedings, Examiners, Patent Applications, Patents, USPTO

See all updates »

Federal Circuit Invalidates Synopsys’ Chip Design Patents as Unpatentable Abstract Ideas

The Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corp., Case No. 2015-1599 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 17, 2016), upholding the lower court’s grant of summary judgment of invalidity under § 101, may provide another…more

Abstract Ideas, Appeals, CLS Bank v Alice Corp, Design Patent, Myriad-Mayo

See all updates »

Boom Predicted in Biodegradable Stent Market

Stents, which are typically inserted into a blood vessel in order to expand the vessel to prevent or alleviate a blockage, have traditionally been made from metal mesh and remained in the body permanently (or until later removed…more

Biodegradable, Biotechnology, FDA, FDA Approval, Life Sciences

See all updates »

Federal Circuit Finds Claims Directed to Encoding and Decoding Image Data Patent-Ineligible

The Federal Circuit recently held in RecogniCorp, LLC v. Nintendo Co., Ltd. (Fed. Cir. 2016) that claims directed to encoding and decoding image data were not patent-eligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101. This ruling further highlights…more

Abstract Ideas, Appeals, CLS Bank v Alice Corp, McRo v Bandai Namco, Patent-Eligible Subject Matter

See all updates »

How to Avoid Mutilating Your Trademark

In a recent precedential decision, In re University of Miami, Serial No. 86616382 (T.T.A.B. June 6, 2017), the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (the “TTAB”) clarified the scope of the doctrine of trademark mutilation…more

Appeals, Corporate Counsel, Examination Attorneys, Trademark Mutilation, Trademark Registration

See all updates »

7 Intellectual Property Issues Startup Entrepreneurs Should Not Overlook

When startups are in the whirlwind of launching a new product or strategizing a marketing plan, there are crucial intellectual property issues that should not be overlooked. Here are seven things startups should know about IP…more

Entrepreneurs, Legal Perspectives, Patents, Popular, Startups

See all updates »

Practical Steps for Building a Strong Life Science Patent Portfolio Worth Billions of Dollars

In the last four years, several companies with antiviral drug programs, including Alios BioPharma, Idenix, Inhibitex, InterMune and Pharmasset, have been acquired by large pharmaceutical companies (‘‘big pharma’’). One of the…more

Acquisitions, Claim Construction, Life Sciences, Patent Portfolios, Patent-Eligible Subject Matter

See all updates »

U.S. Supreme Court Significantly Restricts Patent Owners’ Ability to Control Resale of Patented Items

On Tuesday, May 30, 2017, the Supreme Court of the United States held in Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc. that an authorized sale of a patented product exhausts all of the patentee’s rights in the…more

Exports, Foreign Sales, Imports, Impression Products v Lexmark International, IP License

See all updates »

What the *TM*?!?! The Disparagement Clause has been Bleeped.

Trademark law is an important form of protection for the fashion and beauty industry. It protects both brand owners and consumers by regulating the registration of brands, or source identifiers, of fashion and beauty products. …more

Disparagement, Fashion Branding, Fashion Industry, First Amendment, Free Speech

See all updates »

Federal Circuit Rules for The Medicines Company in Patent Litigation

In an en banc decision on July 12, 2016 in The Medicines Co. v. Hospira, Inc., the Federal Circuit established the circumstances under which a product manufactured according to product-by-process claims is invalid under the “on…more

Appeals, Commercial Marketing, Commercial Offer for Sale, Medco Health Solutions, On-Sale Bar

See all updates »

What the *TM*?!?! The Disparagement Clause has been Bleeped.

Trademark law is an important form of protection for the fashion and beauty industry. It protects both brand owners and consumers by regulating the registration of brands, or source identifiers, of fashion and beauty products. …more

Disparagement, Fashion Branding, Fashion Industry, First Amendment, Free Speech

See all updates »

What the *TM*?!?! The Disparagement Clause has been Bleeped.

Trademark law is an important form of protection for the fashion and beauty industry. It protects both brand owners and consumers by regulating the registration of brands, or source identifiers, of fashion and beauty products. …more

Disparagement, Fashion Branding, Fashion Industry, First Amendment, Free Speech

See all updates »

Legal Alert: Good News for Software Patents?

Federal Circuit’s Enfish Decision and PTO Guidelines Should Give Hope to Patentees - In the last few years, U.S. Courts have drastically changed their interpretation of the law governing patent eligibility, 35 U.S.C. §…more

Abstract Ideas, CLS Bank v Alice Corp, Patent-Eligible Subject Matter, Patents, Popular

See all updates »

Newly Issued U.S. Patent for Knobbe Martens Client Pinnacle Spine Group, LLC

Knobbe Martens client Pinnacle Spine Group, LLC, a developer of innovative spinal fusion systems, today announced that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued U.S. Patent No. 9,216,096 titled Intervertebral Implants and…more

FDA Approval, Medical Devices, Patents, USPTO

See all updates »

Philips Acquires Spectranetics for $2.16 Billion

According to a June 28, 2017 press release, Dutch healthcare company Philips has agreed to buy Colorado Springs-based Spectranetics Corporation, a cardiac device manufacturer, for approximately 1.9 billion euros ($2.16 billion),…more

Acquisitions, Medical Devices, Share Buybacks, Shareholders

See all updates »

Federal Circuit Vacates PTAB Claim Construction and Obviousness Conclusion in Eli Lilly’s IPR against LA BioMed

The Federal Circuit held that a rat study in a provisional application and a conversion method in an uncited reference did not support the claimed human dosage form in Los Angeles Biomed. Research Inst. v. Eli Lilly & Co., No…more

Appeals, Claim Construction, Eli Lilly, Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding, Obviousness

See all updates »

PTAB Denies Apple's Motion to Withdraw IPR Petition and Motion for Joinder

The PTAB denied Apple’s motion to withdraw both its IPR petition and concurrent motion for joinder to prevent Apple from circumventing potential estoppel ramifications in Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG,…more

Apple, Estoppel, Final Written Decisions, Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding, Joinder

See all updates »

U.S. Supreme Court Overturns Apple's $400M Award Against Samsung

A Unanimous U.S. Supreme Court Pulls Back the Reach of Damages Awards for Design Patents Summary The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday, December 6, 2016, unanimously held that damages awards for design patent infringement need not…more

Apple v Samsung, Article of Manufacture, Calculation of Damages, Cell Phones, Component Parts Doctrine

See all updates »

This Year’s Top Ten IP Cases

#10 Design Patent Damages § 289 - Samsung Elecs. Co., v. Apple Inc., 580 U.S. _ (Dec. 6, 2016) - In the case of a multicomponent product, the relevant article of manufacture for arriving at a damages award under…more

Apple v Samsung, Article of Manufacture, Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Standard, Calculation of Damages, Commercial Offer for Sale

See all updates »

Trademark Review | September 2016

BLACK GIRLS ROCK! and BLACK MEN ROCK Deemed Confusingly Similar - This opposition involved a straight-forward likelihood of confusion analysis. Opposer owned a registration for the mark BLACK GIRLS ROCK! for clothing and…more

Accelerated Case Resolution (ACR), Bench Trial, Burden of Proof, Confusingly Similar, Cross Motions

See all updates »

FDA to Create New Digital Health Unit

The FDA has announced that it will create a new unit responsible for overseeing digital health products. According to Bakul Patel, the Associate Center Director for Digital Health at FDA, the agency is working to define “what…more

Digital Health, FDA, Medical Device User Fee Program (MDUFA IV), Software

See all updates »

Have You Been Duped?

In the fashion and beauty world, the copying of higher-priced brands is widespread. While in fashion, the term for copies of designer products is “knockoffs,” in beauty, the term is “dupes.” Whether it is a colloquial use of the…more

Acquired Distinctiveness, Fashion Branding, Fashion Design, Fashion Industry, Trade Dress

See all updates »

Software Copyrights in an Evolving Digital World

In This Presentation: - Software Copyright & Interoperability - Program Language and Function Calls - An Example API in Java - Oracles’ Pattern of APIs - Google’s Copying - Questions? ..Copyright Issues -…more

Android, APIs, Computer-Related Inventions, Copyright, Digital Goods

See all updates »

Magistrate Judge Recommends IPR Estoppel Bar of Prior Art References

A magistrate judge in the Eastern District of Texas recommended in Biscotti, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., No. 2:13-CV-01015, DI 191 (E.D. Tex. May 11, 2017) that Microsoft should be estopped from asserting invalidity grounds that…more

Concurrent Litigation, Estoppel, Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding, Microsoft, Patent Infringement

See all updates »

Three New Tools to Challenge Patents

Among the most significant changes made by the America Invents Act (AIA) are the provisions that permit a business to challenge a patent at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in litigation-type proceedings, but at a lower cost…more

America Invents Act, Covered Business Method Patents, Covered Business Method Proceedings, Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding, Patent Litigation

See all updates »

Knobbe Martens Client STAR Envirotech Wins Affirmance of IPR Decision Finding Patent Valid

On December 31, 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s decision that a STAR Envirotech patent relating to its evaporative emission testing tools is valid and not…more

Automotive Industry, Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding, Obviousness, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Validity

See all updates »

PTAB Applies Collateral Estoppel to Exclude Purported Patent Owner

The PTAB issued an order applying collateral estoppel to determine that one purported owner of U.S. Patent 7,215,752 and U.S. Patent 7,844,041 (the “challenged patents”) had no authority to act as the patent owner in Microsoft…more

Collateral Estoppel, Dismissal With Prejudice, Expungement, Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding, IP Assignment Agreements

See all updates »

10 Strategies For Aggressively Building A Patent Portfolio

Knobbe Martens Partner Ron Schoenbaum hosted an hour-long seminar on September 29 at Plug & Play Tech Center in Sunnyvale, CA. He covered how patent rights are commonly lost and 10 strategies startup companies need to know to…more

Inventors, Patent Applications, Patent Portfolios, Patents, USPTO

See all updates »

Specification as a Tool for Patent Eligibility Analysis

In a recent article, we discussed how courts have used patent specifications in finding that patents satisfy the Supreme Court’s Mayo/Alice test. However, the specification may be a double-edged sword. Language in the…more

Abstract Ideas, Claim Construction, CLS Bank v Alice Corp, Computer-Related Inventions, Myriad-Mayo

See all updates »

Federal Circuit Upholds IPR Decision of Unpatentability in Skky v. MindGeek

The Federal Circuit upheld an IPR final written decision by the PTAB holding that MindGeek’s claims were unpatentable in Skky, Inc. v. MindGeek, S.A.R.L., No. 2016-2018 (Fed. Cir. June 7, 2017)…more

Appeals, Final Written Decisions, Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding, Means-Plus-Function, Obviousness

See all updates »

The Defend Trade Secrets Act: What You Should Do Now

On May 11, 2016, President Obama signed the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) into law. The DTSA is an expansion of the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 and generally authorizes a civil action in federal court for the…more

Anti-Retaliation Provisions, Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA), Employment Contract, Immunity, Misappropriation

See all updates »

Alert: California and the EU’s Changing Privacy Laws

Privacy law has traditionally focused on an individual’s right to privacy vis-à-vis a government’s physical intrusion. Privacy law, however, has morphed in recent years to address concerns of the digital age, including data…more

Breach Notification Rule, Data Breach, EU, International Data Transfers, Personal Data

See all updates »

U.S. Congress Creates Federal Cause of Action for Trade Secret Misappropriation

For the first time in this nation’s history, the U.S. will have a federal trade secrets law that allows private citizens to enforce their trade secrets and sue for damages. On Wednesday, April 27, 2016, the U.S. House of…more

Asset Seizure, Damages, Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA), Ex Parte, Injunctions

See all updates »

Federal Circuit Finds That Fetal Diagnosis Claims Survive Written Description Attacks

Stanford University v. The Chinese University of Hong Kong. Federal Circuit Appeal No. 2015-2011. Decided June 27, 2017. In an appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), the Federal Circuit held that claims related…more

Appeals, Diagnostic Tests, Evidence, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Validity

See all updates »

Disparaging (or Maybe Not) Trademarks: The Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments on In Re Tam

On January 18, 2017, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments regarding whether the Lanham Act’s provision refusing federal trademark registration to disparaging marks is invalid under the Free Speech Clause of the First…more

Appeals, Disparagement, Fashion Industry, First Amendment, Free Speech

See all updates »

Is Brexit an IP Exit?

Voters in the U.K. recently passed a referendum paving the way for the U.K. to leave the European Union (EU). In response, British Prime Minister David Cameron resigned on Wednesday, July 13, 2016, with Theresa May as his…more

Article 50 Treaty of the EU, community, Community Designs, EU, European Patent Office

See all updates »

FDA Approves Bayer’s myBETAapp™

On May 30, 2017, Bayer announced FDA approval of a supplemental Biologics License Application for Bayer’s myBETAapp™ and BETACONNECT Navigator™. The myBETAapp joins the growing field of medical mobile applications, which the…more

Bayer, Biologics, FDA Approval, IP License, Medical Devices

See all updates »

Federal Circuit Holds That the PTAB May Consider Legal Conclusions of Obviousness by Expert Witnesses That Are Supported by Underlying Factual Findings

The Federal Circuit held that the PTAB may consider legal conclusions of obviousness by experts, but the expert papers must make adequate factual findings and provide a satisfactory explanation as to determinations of…more

Appeals, Expert Testimony, Incorporated by Reference, Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding, Obviousness

See all updates »

Former Lutonix VP Pleads Guilty to Trade Secret Theft

On May 9, 2017, according to court records, Christopher Barry, former Vice President of R&D at Lutonix Inc., pled guilty to stealing Lutonix’s trade secrets in the form of several confidential electronic files...…more

Corporate Executives, Criminal Prosecution, Guilty Pleas, Medical Devices, Theft

See all updates »

U.S. Supreme Court Significantly Restricts Patent Owners’ Ability to Control Resale of Patented Items

On Tuesday, May 30, 2017, the Supreme Court of the United States held in Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc. that an authorized sale of a patented product exhausts all of the patentee’s rights in the…more

Exports, Foreign Sales, Imports, Impression Products v Lexmark International, IP License

See all updates »

Confirm Rx: Abbott Receives CE Mark for Smartphone Compatible ICM

Abbott recently announced the CE Mark and first use of what it claims is “the world’s first smartphone compatible” insertable cardiac monitor (ICM), as reported by a press release dated May 8, 2017…more

EU, FDA, Medical Devices, Mobile Health Apps, Smartphones

See all updates »

Federal Circuit Rules on Biosimilar Notice Requirement

Biosimilar Applicants Must Provide Notice of Commercial Launch: What You Need To Know - Case Background - In an opinion released today in Amgen v. Apotex, the Federal Circuit held biosimilar applicants who…more

Amgen, Apotex, Appeals, Biologics, Biosimilars

See all updates »

The PTAB Grants the University of Minnesota Sovereign Immunity but does not Terminate IPR

The PTAB has again addressed sovereign immunity in the context of an IPR. Reactive Surfaces, LTD. petitioned for IPR of U.S. Patents No. 8,394,618 and 8,252,571. The ’618 and ’571 patents are co-owned by Toyota Motor…more

Administrative Proceedings, Eleventh Amendment, Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding, Motion to Dismiss, Patent Trial and Appeal Board

See all updates »

Federal Circuit Finds Claims Directed to Securing Financing Patent Ineligible

In a precedential opinion, the Federal Circuit affirmed the determination by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) in a covered business method review proceeding that the claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,950,807 for providing…more

Abstract Ideas, Appeals, CLS Bank v Alice Corp, Covered Business Method Proceedings, Patent Trial and Appeal Board

See all updates »

Patent Update for IT and Biotech Companies: New Pieces to the Patent Puzzle

In This Presentation: - PATENT ELIGIBLE SUBJECT MATTER: LIFE IN SOFTWARE/IT AFTER ALICE CORPORATION V. CLS BANK (AND OTHER RECENT 101 DECISIONS) - A Brief History with respect to Software and Biz Methods -…more

Biotechnology, CLS Bank v Alice Corp, Direct Infringement, Indefiniteness, Induced Infringement

See all updates »

Meow- Copycat Fur and Bows - Forever 21 Stares Down Puma

As discussed in our previous blog post Puma Treads New Territory Hitting Forever 21 with Copyright Allegations after the Supreme Court’s Star Athletica Decision, Puma sued Forever 21 for design patent infringement, trade dress…more

Copyright Infringement, Design Patent, Forever 21, Irreparable Harm, Patent Infringement

See all updates »

Design Patents Update

In This Presentation: - Part I: Design Patent Overview ...Apple v. Samsung ...What is a Design Patent? ...Differences Between Utility and Design Patents ...Ins and Outs of the Specification ...Benefits &…more

Apple v Samsung, Attorney's Fees, Design Patent, Patent Infringement, Patent Litigation

See all updates »

Design Patents Update

In This Presentation: - Part I: Design Patent Overview ...Apple v. Samsung ...What is a Design Patent? ...Differences Between Utility and Design Patents ...Ins and Outs of the Specification ...Benefits &…more

Apple v Samsung, Attorney's Fees, Design Patent, Patent Infringement, Patent Litigation

See all updates »

U.S. Supreme Court Significantly Restricts Patent Owners’ Ability to Control Resale of Patented Items

On Tuesday, May 30, 2017, the Supreme Court of the United States held in Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc. that an authorized sale of a patented product exhausts all of the patentee’s rights in the…more

Exports, Foreign Sales, Imports, Impression Products v Lexmark International, IP License

See all updates »

Meow- Copycat Fur and Bows - Forever 21 Stares Down Puma

As discussed in our previous blog post Puma Treads New Territory Hitting Forever 21 with Copyright Allegations after the Supreme Court’s Star Athletica Decision, Puma sued Forever 21 for design patent infringement, trade dress…more

Copyright Infringement, Design Patent, Forever 21, Irreparable Harm, Patent Infringement

See all updates »

Newly Issued U.S. Patent for Knobbe Martens Client Pinnacle Spine Group, LLC

Knobbe Martens client Pinnacle Spine Group, LLC, a developer of innovative spinal fusion systems, today announced that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued U.S. Patent No. 9,216,096 titled Intervertebral Implants and…more

FDA Approval, Medical Devices, Patents, USPTO

See all updates »

Curiouser and Curiouser: Copyrights and Trademark Rights are Not Perfect Reflections

Much like the world of Underland created in Lewis Carroll’s book Alice Through the Looking Glass, the blurring between copyright and trademark rights can create a topsy-turvy universe…more

Books, Copyright, Copyright Expiration, Copyright Infringement, Disney

See all updates »

Evaluating Freedom to Operate | Endovascular Today

The third step in bringing your medical device to market is to understand whether you can practice your invention. This article is part three of a series that will present the three big issues in IP: Do you own it? Can…more

Manufacturers, Medical Devices

See all updates »

Researchers Announced A New Implantable Energy Storage System Powered By The Patient’s Body

UCLA announced that scientists from UCLA and University of Connecticut designed a new form of energy storage for powering implantable medical devices that do not require a battery.  According to the announcement, this design…more

Innovation, Medical Devices, Technology, UCLA

See all updates »

Testing of Jenex TherOZap™ Device Set to Begin

Luminar Media Group recently announced that, after completing development of a working prototype device, the Jenex Corporation has signed an agreement with the Techna Institute at the University Health Network to begin testing…more

Medical Devices, Patents, Testing Requirements, Zika

See all updates »

ECRI Institute Releases Guidance on How to Protect Your Medical Device Systems

The ECRI Institute released new guidance in its article: “Ransomware Attacks: How to Protect Your Medical Device Systems” on May 18, 2017. The report recommends various protective actions for hospitals to take and points to…more

Data Breach, Hackers, Health Care Providers, Hospitals, Medical Devices

See all updates »

Strategic Partnership Announced between BioSig Technologies and Mayo Clinic

BioSig Technologies recently announced a ten-year strategic agreement with Mayo Clinic and Mayo Clinic Ventures. According to the press release, the agreement aims to advance clinical features of BioSig’s PURE EP System, which…more

Innovation, Mayo Clinic, Medical Devices, Strategic Partnerships, Technology

See all updates »

Is Trademark Use in Google AdWords Trademark Infringement?

Does the use of Google AdWords amount to the advertising, promoting, marketing, or offering for sale of goods covered by a registered trademark? Tipsy Elves, LLC. vs. Ugly Christmas Sweater, Inc. is the latest in a string of…more

AdWords, Consumer Confusion, Deceptive Intent, False Advertising, Fashion Industry

See all updates »

New York City Makes a Push to Become a Life Sciences Hotspot

New York City took a step toward its goal of becoming a life sciences hub with a $5 million grant from the mayor’s office to BioLabs@NYULangone, a biotech incubator in Manhattan formed from a collaboration between BioLabs and…more

Biotechnology, Grants, Life Sciences, Mayor di Blasio, Startups

See all updates »

FDA Approves Keytruda as First Cancer Treatment Based on a Genetic Biomarker

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently approved Keytruda (pembrolizumab) for treatment of patients whose cancers have a specific genetic feature (biomarker). The FDA has traditionally approved cancer treatments…more

Cancer, FDA, FDA Approval, Genetic Markers, Pharmaceutical Patents

See all updates »

Board Denies Kyle Bass Challenge Against Biogen’s Tecfidera® Patent In View of Unexpected Results

The PTAB issued a Final Written Decision finding that Biogen’s patent on treating Multiple Sclerosis (“MS”) with a certain dose amount was not obvious because the clinical efficacy exhibited by administering this dose amount was…more

Final Written Decisions, Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding, Kyle Bass, Nonobvious, Obviousness

See all updates »

PTAB Grants-in-Part Rare Motion to Amend Based on Unexpected Results

The PTAB granted-in-part a patent owner’s motion to substitute claims based on evidence of secondary considerations of nonobviousness in Valeo North America, Inc. v. Schaeffler Technologies, AG & CO. KG, IPR2016-00502, Paper 37,…more

Evidence, Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding, Motion to Amend, Nonobvious, Patent Trial and Appeal Board

See all updates »

10 Intellectual Property Pitfalls Every Startup Should Avoid

Partner Thomas Yee and Associate Jonathan Menkes presented "10 IP Pitfalls Startups Should Avoid" to a group of local startup companies. Please see full Presenation below for more information…more

Corporate Branding, Due Diligence, Intellectual Property Protection, Patents, Popular

See all updates »

Court Holds That Fashion Designer Karen Millen Cannot Use Her Name in Connection with Future Clothing Lines

A recent UK court held that Karen Millen, a fashion designer and co-founder of the Karen Millen brand, was prohibited from using her name, KM or K.Millen or any other confusingly similar names in connection with clothing and…more

Breach of Contract, Confusingly Similar, Contract Drafting, Contract Terms, Fashion Branding

See all updates »

The Top Hits: Fashion Cases with a Big Impact

Over the last year, there have been some significant trademark and copyright cases in the fashion industry. Below are summaries of recent cases all brand owners should know and understand. These cases touch on important topics…more

Brand, Copyright, Copyright Infringement, Copyrightable Subject Matter, Disparagement

See all updates »

Federal Circuit Rules on Biosimilar Notice Requirement

Biosimilar Applicants Must Provide Notice of Commercial Launch: What You Need To Know - Case Background - In an opinion released today in Amgen v. Apotex, the Federal Circuit held biosimilar applicants who…more

Amgen, Apotex, Appeals, Biologics, Biosimilars

See all updates »

Three New Tools to Challenge Patents

Among the most significant changes made by the America Invents Act (AIA) are the provisions that permit a business to challenge a patent at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in litigation-type proceedings, but at a lower cost…more

America Invents Act, Covered Business Method Patents, Covered Business Method Proceedings, Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding, Patent Litigation

See all updates »

This profile may constitute attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Any correspondence with this profile holder does not constitute a client/attorney relationship. Neither the content on this profile nor transmissions between you and the profile holder through this profile are intended to provide legal or other advice or to create an attorney-client relationship.

"My best business intelligence,
in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.