On June 21, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion in Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System,1 vacating the 2nd Circuit’s previous decision and remanding for further consideration as to...more
7/29/2021
/ Arkansas Teacher Retirement System v Goldman Sachs Group ,
Burden of Persuasion ,
Class Action ,
Class Certification ,
Conflicts of Interest ,
Fraud-on-the-Market ,
Goldman Sachs ,
Investors ,
Presumption of Reliance ,
SCOTUS ,
Securities Exchange Act ,
Securities Litigation ,
Shareholders
Key Points -
The U.S. Supreme Court held that all members of a certified class must demonstrate that they suffered a concrete harm—such as physical injury or monetary loss—to have Article III standing to recover damages in...more
6/30/2021
/ Article III ,
Class Action ,
Class Members ,
Credit Reporting Agencies ,
Credit Reports ,
Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) ,
Injury-in-Fact ,
SCOTUS ,
Standing ,
TransUnion ,
TransUnion LLC v Ramirez
On March 29, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System. In this closely watched case, the Court is expected to clarify the evidentiary burden for...more
The U.S. Supreme Court granted review last week in TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, which presents the question of whether Article III or Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits a damages class action where most...more
12/23/2020
/ Article III ,
Class Certification ,
Class Members ,
Class Representatives ,
Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) ,
FRCP 23 ,
Injury-in-Fact ,
Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) ,
Petition for Writ of Certiorari ,
Standing ,
TransUnion
- In a matter of first impression within the 9th Circuit, the court held that each member of a certified class must have Article III standing in order to recover individual monetary damages at trial.
- Those class members...more
3/9/2020
/ Appeals ,
Article III ,
Class Action ,
Class Certification ,
Class Members ,
Credit Reports ,
Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) ,
Injury-in-Fact ,
Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) ,
Punitive Damages ,
Standing ,
Statutory Damages ,
Statutory Violations ,
TransUnion
• En banc 9th Circuit affirmed a $210 million settlement in multidistrict litigation against Hyundai and Kia relating to their alleged misrepresentations about the fuel efficiency of their vehicles, reversing the decision of...more
• The United States Supreme Court held that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f)’s 14-day deadline for parties to seek permission for interlocutory review of class certification decisions is not subject to equitable...more
3/5/2019
/ Class Action ,
Class Certification ,
Collective Actions ,
Decertification ,
Equitable Tolling ,
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure ,
Filing Deadlines ,
FRCP 23(f) ,
Interlocutory Appeals ,
Leave to Appeal ,
Motion for Reconsideration ,
Nutraceutical Corp v Lambert ,
SCOTUS
• As evidenced by a recent opinion issued in the Northern District of Illinois, district courts continue to wrestle with the applicability of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of...more
• The U.S. Supreme Court held that the tolling provisions established in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah, 414 U.S. 538 (1974) apply to only individual claims, not to successive class actions.
• The Court’s...more
6/13/2018
/ Appeals ,
China Agritech Inc v Resh ,
Class Action ,
Class Certification ,
Class Members ,
Equitable Tolling ,
FRCP 23 ,
Putative Class Actions ,
Reversal ,
SCOTUS ,
Securities Fraud ,
Statute of Limitations ,
Subsequent Litigation
• The U.S. Supreme Court granted a certiorari petition filed by China Agritech from the 9th Circuit’s decision in Resh v. China Agritech, Inc., 857 F.3d 994 (9th Cir. 2017). The Court will clarify whether its landmark ruling...more
12/14/2017
/ American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah ,
Class Action ,
Class Certification ,
Class Members ,
Equitable Tolling ,
Petition for Writ of Certiorari ,
Putative Class Actions ,
Reversal ,
SCOTUS ,
Securities Exchange Act ,
Securities Fraud ,
Statute of Limitations
• The 9th Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a putative class action alleging that ESPN disclosed “personally identifiable information” in violation of the Video Privacy Protection Act of 1988 (VPPA) by knowingly disclosing to...more
On August 15, 2017, the 9th Circuit, in Thomas Robins v. Spokeo, Inc., reversed the district court’s dismissal of an action alleging willful violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq. The 9th...more
8/21/2017
/ Appeals ,
Article III ,
Credit Reports ,
Data Breach ,
Determination on Remand ,
Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) ,
Imminent Harm ,
Injury-in-Fact ,
Ripeness ,
SCOTUS ,
Split of Authority ,
Spokeo v Robins ,
Standard of Review ,
Standing ,
Statutory Violations
On July 7, in In re Petrobras Securities, the 2nd Circuit declined to adopt an independent “administrative feasibility” requirement for class certification under Rule 23. In so holding, the 2nd Circuit joined the 6th, 7th,...more
7/14/2017
/ Administrative Feasibility ,
Ascertainable Class ,
Class Action ,
Class Certification ,
Class Members ,
Corporate Counsel ,
FRCP 23 ,
FRCP 23(b)(3) ,
Petrobras ,
Predominance Requirement ,
Securities Litigation ,
Split of Authority
Facts -
On June 12, 2017, in Microsoft Corporation v. Baker, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that federal courts of appeals lack jurisdiction to review orders striking class allegations after the named plaintiffs...more
6/16/2017
/ Appellate Jurisdiction ,
Article III ,
Class Action ,
Class Certification ,
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ,
Final Judgment ,
FRCP 23 ,
FRCP 23(f) ,
Microsoft v Baker ,
Putative Class Actions ,
SCOTUS ,
Voluntary Dismissals ,
Xbox
On Thursday, April 7, 2017, in McGill v. Citibank, the California Supreme Court held that a pre-dispute arbitration agreement that waives the right to seek public injunctive relief is contrary to public policy and thus...more
4/10/2017
/ Appeals ,
Arbitration ,
Arbitration Agreements ,
CA Supreme Court ,
Citibank ,
Class Action ,
CLRA ,
Credit Card Agreements ,
False Advertising ,
Federal Arbitration Act ,
Injunctive Relief ,
Preemption ,
Public Policy ,
Reversal ,
State and Local Government ,
Statutory Remedies ,
Statutory Rights ,
Unenforceable Contract Terms ,
Unfair Competition
Key Points -
- The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit joined the 6th, 7th, and 8th Circuits in declining to adopt an “administrative feasibility” requirement for plaintiffs seeking to certify a class under...more
Key Points -
- The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit found that Dole’s “All Natural” food labels on products containing synthetic ingredients could be misleading to a reasonable consumer.
- The 9th...more
Key Points
- The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit recently held that district courts have the power to decertify a class even after a jury verdict in favor of the class...more
7/22/2016
/ Abuse of Discretion ,
Class Certification ,
Corporate Counsel ,
Decertify ,
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ,
FRCP 23 ,
Late Fees ,
Loan Servicer ,
Mortgages ,
Privity of Contract ,
The Money Store