News & Analysis as of

Burden of Persuasion

Jumping into the Deep End: Amendment Practice Post-Aqua Products

by WilmerHale on

In the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s recent en banc decision in Aqua Products, a deeply fractured court provides a glimpse into the perspectives that some of the judges have on post-grant practice at the...more

Post-Aqua: The Federal Circuit Vacated Denial Of Patent Owner's Motion To Amend

by Brinks Gilson & Lione on

In Silver Peak Systems, Inc. v. Matal, No. 2015-2017 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 24, 2017), the Federal Circuit vacated the judgment of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent...more

The Patent Trial And Appeal Board Extended One Year Pendency Of An Inter Parte Review For Considering The Impact Of Aqua Products,...

by Brinks Gilson & Lione on

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) issued a first decision extending one year pendency of an inter partes review for good cause. Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc., IPR2016-00868, Paper No. 57 (P.T.A.B. October 5,...more

Petitioner has the Burden of Proving Unpatentability of Amended Patent Claims in IPRs

by Cozen O'Connor on

During an inter partes review (IPR) proceeding concerning Aqua Products, Inc.’s (Aqua) U.S. Patent No. 8,273,183 (the ‘183 patent), the Patent Trial and Appeal Board denied Aqua’s motion to amend certain ‘183 patent claims....more

It May Have Just Gotten a Little Easier to Amend Claims in an IPR

A Factionated Federal Circuit Holds that Petitioner has the Burden to Show Unpatenability - In Aqua Products, Inc., v. Matal, [2015-1177] (October 4, 2017), a plurality of the Federal Circuit en banc held that §316(e)...more

Federal Circuit Finds That Petitioners Have Burden Of Persuasion Of Unpatentability Of Claims Amended During An IPR Proceeding,...

by Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P. on

In a much anticipated decision, the Federal Circuit has narrowly decided that a patent owner moving to amend claims during an inter partes review (IPR) does not have the burden of persuasion that the claims are patentable....more

Burden of Proving Unpatentability of Amended Claims Placed on IPR Petitioners

by Jones Day on

In an en banc decision, the Federal Circuit in Aqua Products, Inc. v. Matal addressed the question of who bears the burden of proving that claims amended during inter partes review ("IPR") proceedings are or are not...more

Federal Circuit Places The Burden Of Persuasion For Motions To Amend In IPRs On Petitioners

by Knobbe Martens on

The Federal Circuit issued an en banc decision instructing the PTAB to assess patentability of amended claims in IPR proceedings without placing the burden of persuasion on the patent owner. Aqua Products, Inc. v. Matal, No....more

The Three Precedential Holdings of AQUA

by Orrick - IP Landscape on

On Wednesday, the en banc Federal Circuit decided Aqua Products, Inc. v. Matal, 2015-1177 (Oct. 4, 2017 Fed. Cir.), which addressed the allocation of burdens when the patent owner in an IPR moves to amend its patent to add...more

AQUA PRODUCTS: The Federal Circuit Shifts The Burden of Proof On Amending Claims During An IPR From The Patent Owner To The...

The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Aqua Products Inc., v. Matal materially changes the burden of proof associated with the patentability of amended claims during an inter partes...more

Petitioners Bear Burden Of Proving Claims Amended During IPR Unpatentable . . . For Now

by Jones Day on

In yesterday’s decision in Aqua Products, Inc. v. Matal, No. 15-1177 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 4, 2017) (en banc), the Federal Circuit issued five opinions, spanning 148 pages, addressing the question of who bears the burden of proving...more

CAFC Eases Amendment Process In IPR Proceedings

by Foley & Lardner LLP on

Today in Aqua Products, Inc. v. Matal, a fractured Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) sitting en banc decided to flip the burden of persuasion onto petitioners in IPR proceedings to show that an amendment is not...more

Aqua Products, Inc. v. Matal: En Banc Decision on Motions to Amend Claims in AIA Post-Grant Proceedings Issues

by Brinks Gilson & Lione on

Those who were hoping for a clear standard to emerge as a result of the Federal Circuit’s grant of en banc review on the issue of burdens of proof for motions to amend in post-grant proceedings under the American Invents Act...more

Amending claims may be getting easier in post-grant proceedings, at least for now

by Thompson Coburn LLP on

In a highly fractured case, the full Federal Circuit today in Aqua Products, Inc. v. Matal, No. 2015-1177, found that the burden of persuasion rests on the petitioner to show that proposed claims in an inter partes review...more

Federal Circuit Concludes that PTAB Not Justified in Placing Burden of Persuasion on Patent Owners When They Seek to Amend Claims...

After several months of consideration, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit sitting en banc in Aqua Products, Inc. v. Matal has concluded that, under the current rules, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is not...more

Aqua Products: Amendments in IPR Proceedings Come Roaring to the Forefront

Have you noticed the momentum of Federal Circuit decisions trending against the PTAB and petitioners? If not, today’s long-anticipated decision in the Aqua Products case will change your thinking. Albeit in a self-described...more

PTAB Considers What Constitutes “By Another” Under § 102(e) in Determining Whether Challenged Claims are Unpatentable

by Knobbe Martens on

In a final written decision in Duncan Parking Tech., Inc. v. IPS Group Inc., IPR2016-00067, Paper 29 (P.TA.B. Mar. 27, 2017), the PTAB evaluated whether a prior art reference alleged to anticipate the challenged patent under...more

In an IPR, the Burden of Persuasion in an Obviousness Challenge Never Shifts to Patentee

by Jones Day on

On March 3, 2017, in a final written decision in IPR2015-01838, the PTAB rejected an obviousness challenge brought by DuPont against a patent owned by Furanix Technologies B. V. directed to methods for preparing the known...more

Passed House of Representatives Bill May Affect the Burden of Persuasion for Patentability of Amended Claims in IPRs

by Brinks Gilson & Lione on

The U.S. House of Representatives recently passed a bill that, if enacted, could make it easier for patent owners to amend their claims during post-grant proceedings such as inter partes reviews (IPR). The proposed law would...more

Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments – December 2016

Monday December 5, 2016 - Voxathon v. FCA, No. 16-1614, Courtroom 201 - This decision arises from a E.D. Tex. case in which the court held that Voxathon’s claims directed to a telephone set with multiple call...more

PTAB Upholds Lialda Patent Over Kyle Bass IPR Challenge

by Foley & Lardner LLP on

The USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has issued a final written decision upholding Shire’s Lialda® patent over the Inter Partes Review (IPR) challenge brought by Kyle Bass and his Coalition for Affordable Drugs. The...more

Patent Rights in the U.S.: Is the Pendulum Finally Swinging Back to Center?

The U.S. patent system has long struggled to strike a balance that both encourages patent rights and prevents patent abuse. Finding that balance requires giving patent owners the right amount of patent enforcement power,...more

Federal Circuit Will Review PTAB Rules for Claim Amendments in AIA Reviews

by McDermott Will & Emery on

The full US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has issued an order granting en banc review of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB’s or Board’s) rules governing amendments filed in the course of America Invents Act...more

Federal Circuit Rebukes PTAB for Shifting Burden of Proof to Patentee in IPR

by McDermott Will & Emery on

Reaffirming the petitioner’s burden of proof codified in 35 USC § 316(e), the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) finding the patent owner’s...more

Federal Circuit Grants En Banc Review of PTAB Amendment Practice

by Brooks Kushman P.C. on

On August 12, 2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted rehearing en banc to appellants in In re Aqua Products, Inc to consider the procedures used by the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to...more

26 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 2
Cybersecurity

"My best business intelligence,
in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.