Seyfarth Synopsis: Consider this hypothetical. Acme Company’s historic operations has contaminated its property and those of its adjacent neighbors. Acme is undertaking a CERCLA remedy under the oversight of U.S. EPA which...more
4/20/2020
/ Approval Requirements ,
Atlantic Richfield Co v Christian ,
CERCLA ,
Clean-Up Costs ,
Contaminated Properties ,
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ,
Jurisdiction ,
Land Owners ,
MT Supreme Court ,
Nuisance ,
Potentially Responsible Party (PRP) ,
Reaffirmation ,
Reversal ,
SCOTUS ,
Site Remediation ,
State Law Claims ,
Strict Liability ,
Trespass
Seyfarth Synopsis: In a toxic tort class action stemming from automotive and dry cleaning facilities’ alleged contamination of groundwater near Dayton, Ohio, the Sixth Circuit affirmed an Ohio federal district court’s grant...more
8/21/2018
/ Battery ,
Civil Conspiracy ,
Class Action ,
Class Certification ,
Contaminated Properties ,
Contamination ,
En Banc Review ,
Fraudulent Concealment ,
FRCP 23(b)(3) ,
FRCP 23(c)(4) ,
Groundwater ,
Hazardous Substances ,
Litigation Strategies ,
Negligence ,
Negligent Misrepresentation ,
Petition For Rehearing ,
Private Nuisance ,
Strict Liability ,
Trespass ,
Unjust Enrichment
Seyfarth Synopsis: Businesses and industries across the country which own or have interests in facilities and properties that may come under the broad scope of these new Superfund “Recommendations” will need to stay attuned...more
Seyfarth Synopsis: With the EPA adding the consideration of vapor intrusion in its Superfund site investigations, hundreds of sites that previously would not rank high enough to qualify for listing on the National Priorities...more
12/12/2016
/ Contaminated Properties ,
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ,
Environmental Site Assessment ,
Final Rules ,
GAO ,
Groundwater ,
National Priorities List (NPL) ,
Oil & Gas ,
Soil ,
Subsurface Conditions ,
Superfund ,
Vapor Intrusion
Seyfarth Synopsis: The Eighth Circuit found that a class action could not be sustained in an environmental pollution case because “the class lacks the requisite commonality and cohesiveness to satisfy Rule 23.”...more
6/1/2016
/ Appeals ,
CERCLA ,
Class Action ,
Class Certification ,
Commonality ,
Contaminated Properties ,
Corporate Counsel ,
Environmental Liability ,
FRCP 23 ,
FRCP 23(b)(2) ,
FRCP 23(b)(3) ,
General Mills ,
Homeowners ,
Negligence ,
Private Nuisance ,
RCRA