If you sell goods in the State of California, you are probably familiar with Proposition 65 (“Prop 65”), which requires businesses to provide a warning before they “knowingly and intentionally expose any individual to a...more
4/15/2021
/ Amended Regulation ,
California ,
Manufacturers ,
OEHHA ,
Proposition 65 ,
Retailers ,
Safe Harbors ,
Suppliers ,
Toxic Chemicals ,
Toxic Exposure ,
Warning Labels
California apartment and other residential rental property landlords and their agents (e.g., property managers) with more than 10 employees need to comply with the State’s Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act (“Prop...more
6/12/2019
/ Landlords ,
New Regulations ,
OEHHA ,
Property Managers ,
Proposition 65 ,
Rental Property ,
Residential Property Owners ,
Safe Harbors ,
Toxic Chemicals ,
Toxic Exposure ,
Warning Labels
The California Office of the Attorney General is seeking to limit certain payment provisions common in Prop. 65 plaintiffs’ settlements with defendants. The proposed rulemaking, published September 25, 2015, would limit the...more
On January 12, 2015, California’s Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment (“OEHHA”) released the long anticipated Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that proposes changes to the warning requirements under Proposition...more
Our previous post on the Second District Court of Appeal’s decision in Center for Biological Diversity v. Department of Fish & Wildlife, No. B245141 (Mar. 20, 2014), highlighted the court’s holdings on California...more
In Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Dep’t of Fish & Wildlife, No. B245141 (Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. Mar. 20, 2014), the appellate court reversed the trial court’s decision, which found that the Department of Fish and Wildlife’s...more