The Federal Circuit has overturned the U.S. International Trade Commission’s longstanding interpretation of section 337(a)(3)(B). Complainant Lashify, Inc. appealed an adverse decision by the U.S. International Trade...more
The PREVAIL Act is now subject to debate before the full Senate.
The Act will require petitioners to certify standing, two new categories of which were recently added via a manager’s amendment....more
1/17/2025
/ America Invents Act ,
Article III ,
Claim Construction ,
Evidentiary Standards ,
Intellectual Property Litigation ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
International Trade Commission (ITC) ,
New Legislation ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
Prior Art ,
Standing ,
USPTO
The decision to end the program follows public resistance to a proposed fee structure aimed at offsetting its high administrative costs.
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) extended the After Final Consideration...more
While a complainant does not need to have constitutional standing to bring a complaint in the International Trade Commission (ITC), at least one complainant must be the owner or exclusive licensee of the underlying asserted...more
Thankfully, that patent case you litigated a few years back is long gone in the rear-view mirror. As the plaintiff, you received a nice lump sum payment and a going forward royalty. Even better, the defendant agreed to never...more
9/23/2015
/ Corporate Counsel ,
Estoppel ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Oracle ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Royalties ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
Popular ,
Settlement Agreements ,
Young Lawyers