Wolf Greenfield Attorneys Review 2025 and Look Ahead to 2026
Practical IP Lessons From the Field Part Two: Navigating IP Risk in Oil & Gas - Energy Law Insights
Practical IP Lessons From the Field Part One: Protecting Innovation in Oil & Gas - Energy Law Insights
USPTO Proposes New Rules to Limit Multiple Validity Challenges — Patents: Post-Grant Podcast
Unexpected Paths to IP Law with Jerry Hrycyszyn and Suresh Rav
Understanding the Impact of IPR Estoppel and PTAB Discretionary Denials — Patents: Post-Grant Podcast
What Were the Cooler Wars? (Part 2) — No Infringement Intended Podcast
A Guide to SEP: Standard Essential Patents for Tech Startups
Wolf Greenfield’s New Shareholders
5 Key Takeaways | Building a Winning Evidentiary Record at the PTAB (and Surviving Appeal)
Wolf Greenfield Attorneys Review 2024 and Look Ahead to 2025
5 Key Takeaways | Alice at 10: A Section 101 Update
Director Review Under the USPTO's Final Rule – Patents: Post-Grant Podcast
AGG Talks: Cross-Border Business Podcast - Episode 20: Mastering ITC Section 337 Investigations
Navigating Intellectual Property Challenges in the Renewable Energy Sector - Energy Law Insights
Patent Considerations in View of the Nearshoring Trends to the Americas
Tonia Sayour in the Spotlight
New Developments in Obviousness-Type Double Patenting and Original Patent Requirements — Patents: Post-Grant Podcast
3 Key Takeaways | What Corporate Counsel Need to Know About Patent Damages
5 Key Takeaways | Rolling with the Legal Punches: Resetting Patent Strategy to Address Changes in the Law
For most executives at middle-market companies, pursuing intellectual property litigation might seem like a prospect to avoid at all costs. Litigation, they believe, is expensive, time-consuming, and unpredictable. Those...more
Knobbe Martens’ 2025 Federal Circuit Year in Review report, covering over 50 of the most noteworthy patent-related Federal Circuit decisions issued last year, is now available! The report provides in-depth analysis from...more
In 2025, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) experienced significant procedural and substantive changes. Under new leadership at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), a series of developments reshaped...more
In a recent case, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s grant of summary judgment of non-infringement of a design patent, signaling heightened scrutiny of functional features in design...more
Precedential and Key Federal Circuit Opinions - U.S. PATENT NO. 7,679,637 LLC v. GOOGLE LLC [OPINION] (2024‑1520, 01/22/2026) (Moore, Hughes, Stoll) - Moore, C.J. The Court affirmed the district court’s dismissal of U.S....more
Less than a year after holding that generic machine-learning patents are abstract in Recentive Analytics, Inc. v. Fox Corp., the Federal Circuit may be refining where to draw the line on patent eligibility....more
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s dismissal of a patent infringement suit, holding that the asserted web conferencing claims were directed to an abstract idea, lacked any inventive...more
The Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Range of Motion Products, LLC v. Armaid Company Inc. highlights a growing dissatisfaction with courts’ broad use of the sufficiently distinct/plainly dissimilar standard to dispose of...more
On January 30, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey entered a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal resolving the pertuzumab BPCIA litigation between Genentech, Inc. and Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. (together,...more
The Federal Circuit’s recent decisions in EcoFactor, Inc. v. Google, LLC (en banc) and Barry v. DePuy Synthes Companies have refined the landscape regarding the admissibility of expert testimony under Federal Rule of Evidence...more
On February 2, 2026, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Judge Joshua D. Wolson, sitting by designation in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware in the Arbutus Biopharma Corporation and...more
On January 30, 2026, the Court ordered Genentech / Hoffmann-La Roche and Shanghai Henlius Biotech / Organon’s stipulated dismissal of Case No. 2:25-cv-14648 (D.N.J.) due to a settlement agreement between the parties. ...more
Our Patent Case Summaries provide a weekly summary of the precedential patent-related opinions issued by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the opinions designated precedential or informative by the Patent Trial...more
On January 16, 2026, District Judge Sanket J. Bulsara (E.D.N.Y.) granted Defendant Flushing Bank’s motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), finding that Plaintiff DigitalDoors, Inc. (“DigitalDoors”) failed to...more
Federal courts continue to grapple with whether profit disgorgement for design patent infringement is a legal remedy for juries or an equitable remedy for judges, an issue the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has...more
Innovative companies stand out from their competitors, attracting talent and investment, boosting revenue and margins, earning new customers and deep brand loyalty....more
This case addresses two primary issues (i) whether the district court erred in construing the claim term “composition” in FMC’s pesticide patents to mean only “stable compositions,” based on disclosures found in a provisional...more
This chart summarizes the case name, presiding judge, drug, and patents-at-issue in all federal district court cases that are filed pursuant to the Hatch-Waxman Act....more
A collection of easy links to the key pieces of legislation and rules governing the Unified Patent Court and unitary patent...more
This week, the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s grant of summary judgment of noninfringement for appellee Hulu, finding that Hulu did not infringe method claim 16 of Sound View Innovations’ U.S. Patent No....more
A Reminder on Sealing Rules- Parties often wish to prevent public disclosure of sensitive business and proprietary information that can become the subject of litigation, especially in patent cases. A recent decision from...more
Last year we discussed the implications of the Supreme Court’s choice not to review the Federal Circuit’s SnapRays decision for patent owners that rely on the Amazon Patent Evaluation Express (“APEX”) program. A recent case...more
Last week, Judge Nusrat J. Choudhury (E.D.N.Y.) denied a motion to stay a patent case pending completion of ex parte reexamination (“EPR”) proceedings challenging the validity of some but not all of the patents-in-suit. ...more