On May 24, 2018, Apple was awarded a verdict of $533 million for Samsung’s infringement of three Apple design patents. While unsuccessful ex parte reexaminations (EPRs) were filed against two of those three design patents,...more
6/7/2018
/ Apple ,
Apple v Samsung ,
Article of Manufacture ,
Attorney's Fees ,
Damages ,
Design Patent ,
Estoppel ,
Ex Partes Reexamination ,
Filing Fees ,
Jury Verdicts ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Invalidity ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patents ,
Prior Art ,
Samsung
In the wake of the September 16, 2011, enactment of the America Invents Act (“AIA”), many third-party individuals and organizations began utilizing the newly created post-grant proceedings to challenge the validity of issued...more
Are Ex Parte Reexaminations An Overlooked Method of Challenging Patents?
In the wake of the September 16, 2011, enactment of the America Invents Act ("AIA"), many third-party individuals and organizations began utilizing...more
In This Presentation:
- Trademarks:
• What is a trademark?
• How do you protect a trademark?
• How do you avoid infringing trademarks of others?
- Copyrights:
• What is a copyright?
• How do you...more
The Supreme Court issued decisions in two cases yesterday that will make it easier for defendants to seek sanctions against non-practicing entities or any other entity for abusive patent litigation. In Highmark Inc. v....more