In a significant development for patent litigants, the Federal Circuit in Ingenico Inc. v. IOENGINE, LLC, affirmed an important limitation on the scope of IPR estoppel under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2). Specifically, the court held...more
5/13/2025
/ §315(e) ,
Appeals ,
Estoppel ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Litigation Strategies ,
Patent Invalidity ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Validity ,
Patents ,
Prior Art ,
Statutory Interpretation
In a significant decision, the Federal Circuit reversed the U.S. International Trade Commission’s (ITC) finding that claims of U.S. Patent No. 10,508,502 (502 Patent) were invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The opinion addresses...more
The U.S. Supreme Court has once again been urged to revisit 35 U.S.C. § 101, the statute governing patent eligibility. Audio Evolution Diagnostics, Inc. (AED) filed a petition for writ of certiorari, challenging the Federal...more
2/6/2025
/ Alice/Mayo ,
Intellectual Property Protection ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Invalidity ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent-Eligible Subject Matter ,
Patents ,
Petition for Writ of Certiorari ,
Rule 36 ,
SCOTUS ,
Section 101 ,
USPTO