Latest Posts › Appointments Clause

Share:

Supreme Court Preserves PTAB But Requires USPTO Director Discretionary Review of PTAB Decisions

The US Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision on June 21 in United States v. Arthrex, Inc., addressing whether the authority of administrative patent judges (APJs) of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to...more

Government Arguments Potentially Open Constitutional Can of Worms Regarding PTAB Appointments

In response to arguments made by the US government in an appeal pending before the US Supreme Court, members of Congress requested an investigation into the adequacy of due process afforded to Patent Trial and Appeal Board...more

Recent Federal Circuit Decision Suggests Patent Challengers Cannot Invoke Arthrex

A recent decision by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit suggests that petitioners who unsuccessfully challenge patents in an inter partes review (IPR) at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) cannot rely on...more

Administrative Patent Judges Are Safe for Now, but Will Scores of PTAB Decisions Get a Do-Over?

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently held that the statutory scheme governing the administrative patent judges of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board is in violation of the Appointments Clause of the US...more

5 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide