The Federal Circuit recently held that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board is not constrained by parties’ proposed constructions and may, in fact, adopt an alternative construction that the Board raises for the first time at...more
Recent patent reform legislation, rule changes, and court rulings are expected to have a significant impact on the strategies of both patent owners and petitioners....more
5/3/2017
/ America Invents Act ,
Claim Construction ,
Discovery ,
Estoppel ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Patent Invalidity ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Ownership ,
Patent Reform ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patent Wars ,
Patents ,
Post-Grant Review ,
Prior Art ,
USPTO
A patent does not qualify for “covered business method” review if its claims are only incidental to a financial activity.
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) recently decided that a claimed method (in...more
The Federal Circuit recently held that petitioners will not be estopped from raising in subsequent proceedings any noninstituted grounds deemed “redundant” by the Board or otherwise denied without meritorious consideration....more
The PTAB issues its second round of proposed rule changes.
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) just issued its second round of proposed rule changes to post-patent issuance review proceedings (Inter Partes Reviews,...more
8/26/2015
/ Additional Discovery ,
America Invents Act ,
Claim Construction ,
Comment Period ,
Confidential Information ,
Covered Business Method Proceedings ,
Expert Testimony ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Owner Preliminary Response ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
Post-Grant Review ,
Proposed Regulation ,
Rule 11 ,
USPTO