Price-fixing agreements among horizontal competitors raise significant antitrust concerns under Section 1 of the Sherman Act....more
Violations of the Sherman Act generally require a demonstration of market power in the “relevant market.” The relevant market has two components—the relevant product market and the relevant geographic market....more
Section 1 of the Sherman Act prohibits any “contract, combination ... or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce.” As a result, in order to establish a viable claim under this section, there must be factual evidence of...more
Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, prohibits “every contract, combination … or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce.” Determining whether such a “contract, combination … or conspiracy” (i.e., the agreement...more
Unlawful tying involves an agreement between a buyer and a seller whereby the seller conditions the sale of a good or service in one market (the “tying” product) upon the buyer’s agreement to buy a second good or service (the...more
A violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act requires an agreement between two or more separate economic entities. In Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp., 467 U.S. 752 (1984), the Supreme Court of the United States...more
Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a)(1), provides the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) with broad authority to address “unfair methods of competition.” Although Congress chose not to define the...more
Until closing, parties to a merger, acquisition, or similar transaction must remain independent competitors. Failure to do so is known as “gun jumping” and can be a simultaneous violation of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust...more