BOT M8 LLC v. SONY INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT LLC -
Before Prost, Reyna, and Cunningham. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: A party challenging the Board’s decision by alleging claim construction...more
SANOFI-AVENTIS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH V. MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
Before Reyna, Mayer, and Cunningham. Appeal from Patent Trial and Appeal Board....more
AMERICAN NATIONAL v. SLEEP NUMBER CORPORATION [OPINION]- PRECEDENTIAL -
Before Stoll, Schall, and Cunningham. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2019-00497...more
WEISNER v. GOOGLE LLC -
Before Stoll, Reyna, and Hughes, Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Summary: The specific implementation of an abstract idea, such as improving...more
Before Stoll, Schall, and Cunningham. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas....more
Before Moore, Taranto, and Stark. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.
Summary: Under the Patent Act , an “inventor” must be a natural person. Therefore, an AI system cannot...more
PAVO SOLUTIONS LLC v. KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, INC.
Before: Lourie, Prost, and Chen. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
Summary: A court can correct obvious minor...more
HOYT AUGUSTUS FLEMING V. CIRRUS DESIGN CORPORATION -
Before Lourie, Hughes, and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: A claim is obvious where “the proposed combination of [the...more
EVOLUSION CONCEPTS, INC. v. HOC EVENTS, INC.
Before Prost, Taranto, and Chen. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
Summary: Claim that requires the removal of a...more
MODERNATX, INC. v. ARBUTUS BIOPHARMA CORPORATION -
Before Lourie, O’Malley and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: A presumption of obviousness based on overlapping ranges requires showing...more
12/2/2021
/ Biotechnology ,
Intellectual Property Protection ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Life Sciences ,
Moderna Inc. ,
Obviousness ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Pharmaceutical Industry ,
Pharmaceutical Patents ,
Prior Art
In Re: Juniper Networks, Inc.
Before Lourie, Bryson, and Taranto. Per Curiam. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.
Summary: A party’s relatively...more
9/27/2021
/ Abuse of Discretion ,
Evidence ,
Intellectual Property Protection ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patents ,
Principal Place of Business ,
Transfer of Venue ,
Venue ,
Witnesses ,
Writ of Mandamus
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS -
Before Lourie, Bryson and O’Malley. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: In claims for methods of using apparatuses or compositions, statements of...more
8/17/2021
/ Eli Lilly ,
Intellectual Property Protection ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Life Sciences ,
Obviousness ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
Pharmaceutical Industry ,
Pharmaceutical Patents ,
Teva Pharmaceuticals
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY -
Before LOURIE, BRYSON, and O’MALLEY. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: The presumption of nexus analysis requires the fact finder to consider the...more
8/17/2021
/ Eli Lilly ,
Intellectual Property Protection ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Life Sciences ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
Pharmaceutical Industry ,
Pharmaceutical Patents ,
Teva Pharmaceuticals