Takeaway: We have written about “no-poach” class actions, in which employers allegedly conspire not to recruit or hire each other’s employees with the intent of driving down wages. See Eleventh Circuit reinstates no-hire...more
6/30/2025
/ Antitrust Litigation ,
Antitrust Violations ,
Appeals ,
Corporate Counsel ,
Employment Litigation ,
Fraudulent Concealment ,
Motion to Dismiss ,
No-Poaching ,
Putative Class Actions ,
Sherman Act ,
Statute of Limitations
Takeaway: Consumer class actions primarily target a damages remedy. In the antitrust context, state antitrust law provides the path to damages for indirect purchasers, because federal antitrust law bars indirect purchaser...more
In a prior post [First Circuit addresses an issue that continues to vex (and split) the circuits: should a class be certified that includes uninjured class members? (October 24, 2018)], we reported on a First Circuit...more