The Federal Circuit on May 11, 2017, addressing the question for the first time, held that statements made by a patent owner during inter partes review (“IPR”) proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) can...more
In its first design patent case in over a century, the Supreme Court on Tuesday, December 6, 2016, reversed a damages award Apple Inc. (“Apple”) had won over Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (“Samsung”) in their protracted...more
In a precedential opinion issued en banc on Friday, October 7, 2016, the Federal Circuit overturned a panel decision, affirming and reinstating the district court’s judgment and the jury’s verdict. The majority opinion...more
10/13/2016
/ Apple ,
Apple v Samsung ,
Claim Construction ,
Corporate Counsel ,
En Banc Review ,
Mobile Devices ,
Motorola ,
Obviousness ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patents ,
Samsung ,
Smartphones ,
Technology ,
Telecommunications ,
Teva v Sandoz ,
Young Lawyers