In extraordinary times, sometimes the ordinary is comforting, so we want to bring you a short newsletter this month and provide some operating details for the major patent agencies in the US.
First, we hope all our...more
The PTAB Strategies and Insights newsletter provides timely updates and insights into how best to handle proceedings at the USPTO. It is designed to increase return on investment for all stakeholders looking at the entire...more
3/3/2020
/ Administrative Patent Judges ,
America Invents Act ,
Estoppel ,
Follow-On Patent Petitions ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Judicial Discretion ,
Litigation Strategies ,
Motion to Amend ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
USPTO
In Personal Audio, the Federal Circuit upheld a district court judgment dismissal of a jury verdict for patent owner throwing out a $1.3 million judgement because the patent was later invalidated at the PTAB. Patent owner...more
2/11/2020
/ Appeals ,
Collateral Estoppel ,
Constitutional Challenges ,
Final Written Decisions ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Jury Verdicts ,
Litigation Strategies ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
Reversal ,
Subsequent Litigation
The only real answers we are hearing from the patent community is that no one knows what to do or what might happen next --- post Arthrex.
As a quick reminder – the Federal Circuit ruled (1) the current PTAB judges were...more
2/5/2020
/ Administrative Patent Judges ,
Administrative Procedure Act ,
Administrative Proceedings ,
America Invents Act ,
Appointments Clause ,
Constitutional Challenges ,
Denial of Certiorari ,
Litigation Strategies ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
Petition for Writ of Certiorari ,
Remand ,
Severability Doctrine ,
Split of Authority ,
USPTO
The PTAB Strategies and Insights newsletter provides timely updates and insights into how best to handle proceedings at the USPTO. It is designed to increase return on investment for all stakeholders looking at the entire...more
2/1/2020
/ Administrative Patent Judges ,
Appeals ,
Appointments Clause ,
CLS Bank v Alice Corp ,
Collateral Estoppel ,
Constitutional Challenges ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Judicial Appointments ,
Jury Verdicts ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
Reversal ,
SCOTUS ,
Subsequent Litigation
The PTAB Strategies and Insights newsletter provides timely updates and insights into how best to handle proceedings at the USPTO. It is designed to increase return on investment for all stakeholders looking at the entire...more
11/27/2019
/ § 315(b) ,
Administrative Patent Judges ,
Administrative Proceedings ,
Appeals ,
Appointments Clause ,
Constitutional Challenges ,
Evidence ,
Final Written Decisions ,
Litigation Strategies ,
Motivation to Combine ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
Prior Art ,
Service of Process ,
Time-Barred Claims
Supplemental Examination was born out of fixing potential inequitable conduct issues before they are raised in a court proceeding. 35 U.S.C. § 257(a); 27 CFR § 1.601; M.P.E.P. § 2800. The stated goal is to improve patent...more
The PTAB Strategies and Insights newsletter provides timely updates and insights into how best to handle proceedings at the USPTO. It is designed to increase return on investment for all stakeholders looking at the entire...more
The PTAB Strategies and Insights newsletter provides timely updates and insights into how best to handle proceedings at the USPTO. It is designed to increase return on investment for all stakeholders looking at the entire...more
The USPTO explained the significance of the cases as follows:
Becton, Dickinson and Company v. B. Braun Melsungen AG, Case IPR2017-01586 (PTAB Dec. 15, 2017) (Paper 8) – (precedential as to section III.C.5, first paragraph...more
In IPR2019-00567 (Paper 23 at 29-30) and IPR2019-00568 (Paper 22 at 23-24), the PTAB, for potentially the first time, denied institution partially based on the Petitioner raising the same issues in its Petition that had been...more
9/5/2019
/ §314(a) ,
Claim Construction ,
Claim Preclusion ,
Estoppel ,
International Trade Commission (ITC) ,
Parallel Proceedings ,
Partial Institution ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
Prior Art
The Federal Circuit recently decided a reexamination case, VirnetX v. Apple and Cisco, that addressed two issues: (1) was requester estopped from maintaining its reexams under the pre-AIA version of 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) (2006)...more
The PTAB Strategies and Insights newsletter provides timely updates and insights into how best to handle proceedings at the USPTO. It is designed to increase return on investment for all stakeholders looking at the entire...more
8/30/2019
/ § 315(b) ,
Administrative Proceedings ,
Estoppel ,
Inter Partes Reexamination ,
International Trade Commission (ITC) ,
Parallel Proceedings ,
Partial Institution ,
Patent Invalidity ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
Section 325(d) ,
Time-Barred Claims ,
USPTO
A third version of the Trial Practice Guide issued this week as both a Federal Register notice and updates....more
The movie Zootopia was hysterically funny because it equated animal stereotypes to what we encounter every day. For example, the best employee at the DMV was named Flash – who was a sloth. Actually, the entire DMV was run by...more
7/20/2019
/ Administrative Backlogs ,
Administrative Procedure ,
America Invents Act ,
Ex Partes Reexamination ,
Patent Expiration ,
Patent Invalidity ,
Patent Ownership ,
Patent Reissue Applications ,
Patents ,
Prior Art ,
Reissue Patents ,
USPTO
The PTAB Strategies and Insights newsletter provides timely updates and insights into how best to handle proceedings at the USPTO. It is designed to increase return on investment for all stakeholders looking at the entire...more
In Regents of the Univ. of Minn. v. LSI Corporation, Fed. Cir., No. 18-01559, the Federal Circuit extended the inability to stand behind 11th Amendment Sovereign Immunity to patents owned by individual states, such that they...more
6/25/2019
/ Administrative Proceedings ,
Appeals ,
Eleventh Amendment ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
IP Assignment Agreements ,
IP License ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
Sovereign Immunity ,
State Universities ,
Tribal Governments
In Return Mail, Inc. v. U.S. Postal Serv., 17-1594, Justice SOTOMAYOR wrote for the majority to overturn a Federal Circuit decision that the U.S. Postal Service had standing to petition for covered business method review. The...more
6/24/2019
/ Administrative Agencies ,
America Invents Act ,
Congressional Intent ,
Covered Business Method Proceedings ,
Ex Partes Reexamination ,
Government Entities ,
Intellectual Property Protection ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patent Validity ,
Patents ,
Post-Grant Review ,
Return Mail Inc v United States Postal Service ,
Reversal ,
SCOTUS ,
Standing ,
Statutory Interpretation ,
USPS
The PTAB Strategies and Insights newsletter provides timely updates and insights into how best to handle proceedings at the USPTO. It is designed to increase return on investment for all stakeholders looking at the entire...more
6/21/2019
/ § 315(b) ,
Administrative Procedure ,
Administrative Proceedings ,
America Invents Act ,
Congressional Committees ,
Government Entities ,
Government Owned Intellectual Property ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Legislative Agendas ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patent-Eligible Subject Matter ,
Patents ,
Real Party in Interest ,
SCOTUS ,
Section 101 ,
Sovereign Immunity
In AVX v Presidio, the Federal Circuit again found the Petitioner could not appeal a partial loss because it lacked standing to appeal as there was no underlying lawsuit on the patent involved in the IPR proceeding....more
Just after making the NHK and Valve Corp decisions precedential, the Board distinguished them in Amazon. While NHK and Valve Corp resulted in denial, in Amazon the Board instituted trial despite Amazon having similar issues...more
5/29/2019
/ Administrative Proceedings ,
Amazon ,
Claim Construction ,
Discovery ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Parallel Proceedings ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Ownership ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
Precedential Opinion ,
Prior Art
In IPR2018-00272, the Board denied a motion to terminate brought by a Patent Owner who argued that a district court’s finding of indefiniteness required termination of the PTAB proceedings for U.S. Patent. 9,393,208....more
5/28/2019
/ Claim Construction ,
Indefiniteness ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Motion to Terminate ,
Parallel Proceedings ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Invalidity ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Ownership ,
Patent Validity ,
Patents ,
Prior Art ,
Section 102 ,
Section 103 ,
Section 112 ,
Trial Court Orders
The PTAB Strategies and Insights newsletter provides timely updates and insights into how best to handle proceedings at the USPTO. It is designed to increase return on investment for all stakeholders looking at the entire...more
The USPTO issued guidance regarding procedures to stay when reissue or reexaminations are pending during a parallel AIA proceeding. The basic factors that will be considered are...more
The PTAB added three new precedential decisions following an older precedential decision directed to acceptable circumstance for a petitioner to change the real party in interest during trial - even after a bar date has...more