#10 Design Patent Damages § 289 -
Samsung Elecs. Co., v. Apple Inc., 580 U.S. _ (Dec. 6, 2016) -
In the case of a multicomponent product, the relevant article of manufacture for arriving at a damages award under...more
1/20/2017
/ Apple v Samsung ,
Article of Manufacture ,
Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Standard ,
Calculation of Damages ,
Commercial Offer for Sale ,
Component Parts Doctrine ,
Cuozzo Speed Technologies v Lee ,
Customs Infringement ,
Design Patent ,
Disparagement ,
Enhanced Damages ,
Exhaustion Doctrine ,
Exports ,
First Amendment ,
Forum Selection ,
Forum Shopping ,
Free Speech ,
Halo v Pulse ,
Imports ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
International Trade Commission (ITC) ,
Laches ,
Lanham Act ,
Lee v Tam ,
Lexmark v Static Control Components ,
Non-Appealable Decisions ,
On-Sale Bar ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patents ,
Remand ,
Reversal ,
SCOTUS ,
Statute of Limitations ,
Tariff Act of 1930 ,
TC Heartland LLC v Kraft Foods ,
Trademark Registration ,
Trademarks ,
Venue ,
Willful Infringement
In a unanimous decision yesterday, the Supreme Court eliminated the requirement that patentees must show that an infringer was objectively reckless in order to obtain enhanced patent damages. The decision returned to the...more
6/15/2016
/ 35 U.S.C. § 284 ,
Abuse of Discretion ,
Enhanced Damages ,
Halo v Pulse ,
Judicial Discretion ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patents ,
Preponderance of the Evidence ,
SCOTUS ,
Seagate ,
Standard of Proof ,
Standard of Review ,
Stryker v Zimmer ,
Willful Infringement
Did you ever wonder how people can call for the end of our patent system? The answer is simple. They have no experience with great inspiring inventors. We at Knobbe Martens have the honor of frequently working with great...more
For nearly two decades, the Federal Circuit has applied a lenient standard for federal jurisdiction that routinely sweeps state law claims into the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts merely because the claims...more