As we discussed in a previous post, the Northern District of California recently dismissed a plaintiff’s claim that the term “vanilla” was misleading on the label of a soymilk product. The Southern District of New York has...more
2/4/2021
/ Beverage Manufacturers ,
Breach of Warranty ,
Deceptively Misdescriptive ,
Dismissals ,
Failure To State A Claim ,
False Advertising ,
Food Labeling ,
Food Marketing ,
Fraud ,
Negligent Misrepresentation ,
Pleadings ,
Putative Class Actions ,
Unjust Enrichment
The Northern District of California recently dismissed a Plaintiff’s claim that the term “vanilla” was misleading on the label of a soymilk product, but left the proverbial door open for the filing of an amended...more
The California Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, recently affirmed judgment in favor of a fruit snack manufacturer who claimed “fruit” was stated to be the first ingredient on a front label but listed “fruit puree”...more