News & Analysis as of

Pleadings

Ladas & Parry LLP

Hikma Pharmaceutical USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma Inc.

Ladas & Parry LLP on

​​​​​​​In a unanimous decision of June 4, 2026 in Hikma Pharmaceutical USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma Inc., authored by Justice Jackson, the Supreme Court clarified the pleading requirements for claims of induced patent...more

Farella Braun + Martel LLP

Supreme Court Decision Provides Ammo for Use Against Indirect Patent Infringement Claims

The Supreme Court issued its decision today in Hikma Pharmaceuticals v. Amarin Pharma, addressing what it takes to successfully plead a claim for indirect patent infringement...more

Dickinson Wright

Privilege at Risk: How Pleading Lack of Legal Understanding Can Backfire

Dickinson Wright on

What happens when a party claims it misunderstood the legal consequences of a contract, but had in fact obtained legal advice at the time it was executed? The short answer is that it can result in a complete loss of...more

Hicks Johnson

Texas Business Court Rejects Fiduciary Duty Claims That Go Beyond the Pleadings

Hicks Johnson on

The Texas Business Court’s decision in Enosis Investments, LLC v. Jensen turns on a simple point: Fiduciary duties depend on what is pleaded. The case arises out of a real estate development project structured through a...more

Rumberger | Kirk

Sounding Right, Being Wrong: The Growing Threat of AI-Generated Court Pleadings

Rumberger | Kirk on

Courts in Florida and across the country are grappling with a rapidly growing crisis: the submission of court filings produced with the assistance of generative artificial intelligence that cite nonexistent cases or cite...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Civil RICO’s Losing Streak Continues in the Commercial Division

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

As noted in the title, civil RICO claims are on such a bad losing streak at the pleading stage in the Commercial Division that they’re beginning to rival the New York Mets. And that’s coming from a die-hard Mets fan....more

Stikeman Elliott LLP

B.C. Court Confirms Strict Gatekeeper Role and Dismisses Secondary Market Claims in Larouche v. PGM

Stikeman Elliott LLP on

In Larouche v. PGM ResidualCo Holdings Inc., 2026 BCSC 674, the British Columbia Supreme Court (the “Court”) refused leave to pursue secondary market claims under the B.C. Securities Act(“Act”) in a proposed class action...more

Miles Mediation & Arbitration

[Webinar] Best Practices Series Seminar (93rd) - June 10th, 9:00 am - 5:00 pm CDT

Topics include: - Public Interest Law - The MMPA: Pleadings, Practices & Pitfalls - Bad Faith Insurance Risk: Case Law Update - Effective Use of Electronically Stored Information During Trial - Creativity and...more

Cranfill Sumner LLP

Court of Appeals Clarifies Limits of Legislative Immunity at Rule 12 Stage

Cranfill Sumner LLP on

In Holsey-Hyman v. Edens (N.C. Ct. App. Apr. 15, 2026), the North Carolina Court of Appeals addressed the boundary between protected legislative acts and unprotected administrative or political conduct by local officials....more

Freiberger Haber LLP

Conclusory Claims Fall Short: Second Department Dismisses Fraud and GBL § 349 Claims Against Insurance Adjuster

Freiberger Haber LLP on

In Wimbish v. Crema-Samalya, 2026 N.Y. Slip Op. 02691 (2d Dept. Apr. 29, 2026), the Appellate Division, Second Department, underscored the limits of fraud and consumer protection claims. Reversing a Kings County Supreme Court...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Clean Sweep: B.C. Supreme Court Dismisses Secondary Market Claims on Multiple Grounds

On April 16, 2026, in Larouche v. PGM ResidualCo Holdings Inc., the British Columbia Supreme Court (Court) denied leave to commence secondary market claims under the B.C. Securities Act (Act) in a proposed class action...more

Bennett Jones LLP

No Agreement, No Conspiracy: Ontario Court Affirms Civil Conspiracy Requires a Pleaded Agreement

Bennett Jones LLP on

Ontario appellate courts continue to underscore that civil conspiracy claims must observe principles of corporate separateness. In Cervantes v. Pizza Nova Take Out Ltd., 2026 ONSC 713, the Ontario Divisional Court reaffirmed...more

Bennett Jones LLP

Federal Court Dismisses C$5 Billion Generic Drug Price-Fixing Class Action

Bennett Jones LLP on

The Federal Court of Canada has found that a C$5 billion class action alleging an industry-wide conspiracy to fix generic drug prices in Canada has no basis in fact....more

Holland & Knight LLP

It's About What You Know

Holland & Knight LLP on

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas dismissed certain pre-suit willful infringement and inducement claims premised upon knowledge of a related patent application to the asserted patent, but allowed...more

Marshall Dennehey

No Certificate of Merit Requirement in Federal Court

Marshall Dennehey on

Berk v. Choy, 607 U.S. ---, --- S. Ct. ---, 2026 WL 135975 (January 20, 2026) - In Pennsylvania, it has long been the rule that a party pursuing a lawsuit against a licensed professional must first obtain expert support for...more

Hicks Johnson

Particularized Facts and Damages at the Pleading Stage: Delaware Court of Chancery Provides Guidance

Hicks Johnson on

In Caerus Group, LLC v. Chemicar Europe NV, the Delaware Court of Chancery (Vice Chancellor David) granted motions to dismiss in consolidated actions arising from a joint venture dispute, clarifying that conclusory labels and...more

Swope, Rodante P.A.

Berk v. Choy and Federal Pleading: Implications for Florida Medical Negligence Litigators

Swope, Rodante P.A. on

The Supreme Court’s January 20, 2026 decision in Berk v. Choy, 607 U.S. ___ (2026), held that Delaware’s affidavit-of-merit requirement—mandating an expert affidavit accompany a medical malpractice complaint—does not apply in...more

Morgan Lewis

The Risks of Hallucinations and Misuse of Generative Artificial Intelligence Before French Courts

Morgan Lewis on

As with many other jurisdictions worldwide, French courts are starting to be confronted with hallucinations created by artificial intelligence (AI), which take the form of erroneous case-law references produced in the...more

Ropes & Gray LLP

Spurgeon & Ors v Capita: High Court Refuses Application to Strike Out Data Breach Compensation Claims

Ropes & Gray LLP on

Spurgeon & Ors v Capita plc [2026] EWHC 241 (KB) (9 February 2026). The High Court has refused an application to strike out compensation claims brought by around 4,000 individuals affected by the Capita data security breach....more

Troutman Amin LLP

“NOT CONVINCED”: An Early Effort to Raise Consent in a TCPA Suit May Have Just Backfired Badly for a Defendant

Troutman Amin LLP on

Repeat after me: you cannot raise a consent defense at the pleadings stage unless the complaint specifically alleges the fact consent was provided. It always makes me cringe when I see TCPA defendants lobbing purported...more

UB Greensfelder LLP

Why Vague Trade Secret Claims Fail in Court

UB Greensfelder LLP on

Trade secret disputes often begin with strong language. Companies describe information as “confidential,” “proprietary,” or “trade secret” and assume those labels will carry weight in litigation. They do not....more

Esquire Deposition Solutions, LLC

Florida Trial Courts Demand Disclosure of AI Use in Pleadings

The two largest judicial districts in Florida will now require lawyers to certify whether artificial intelligence was used in any fashion to create pleadings filed in their courts. Legal research and document drafting, both...more

Hicks Johnson

Fifteenth Court Clarifies When Business Court Jurisdiction Disappears

Hicks Johnson on

In last week's opinion in In re ColossusBets Limited, the Fifteenth Court of Appeals offered a clear illustration of how Texas’ new Business Court interacts with traditional pleading amendments — and what happens when a...more

McGuireWoods LLP

High Court Ruling Could Block Expert Certification Rules in Federal Construction Suits

McGuireWoods LLP on

The Supreme Court’s decision on January 26, 2026, in Berk v. Choy should put to rest the long‑running debate over whether state-law certificate of merit requirements apply in federal court. Under the Court’s straightforward...more

Benesch

Early Evidence? Not in This Court!: Supreme Court Clarifies Federal Rules Govern Over State Law

Benesch on

In Berk v. Choy, the Supreme Court held that a Delaware state law that requires plaintiffs bringing medical malpractice claims to set forth evidence of the suit’s merits via an affidavit of merit early in the case was...more

337 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 14

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide