At the end of 2018, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued an opinion in One World Techs., Inc. v. United States. In that decision, Judge Choe-Groves concluded that U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)...more
5/20/2019
/ Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) ,
Appeals ,
Asset Seizure ,
Court of International Trade ,
Customs and Border Protection ,
Exclusion Orders ,
Imports ,
Injunctions ,
Injunctive Relief ,
Interlocutory Appeals ,
International Trade Commission (ITC) ,
Irreparable Harm ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patents ,
Preliminary Injunctions ,
Section 337 ,
Separation of Powers ,
Subject Matter Jurisdiction ,
Tariff Act of 1930
On August 18, 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit reaffirmed its April 2014 decision in NAM v. SEC, where it held that certain portions of the SEC’s conflict minerals reporting requirements unconstitutionally...more
As we have discussed over the last few months, the fate of the conflict minerals rule has been uncertain. In April 2014, in the National Association of Manufacturers (“NAM”) case, the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit...more
On May 14, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a per curium order denying the motion filed by the National Association of Manufacturers (“NAM”) to stay the SEC’s Conflict Minerals Rule....more
On May 7, 2014 the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit filed a per curiam order in response to the appellant’s emergency motion for stay of the SEC’s Conflict Minerals Rule...more