Before Chen, Bryson, and Stoll. Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary: Federal patent laws preempted a state-law conversion claim. Inventorship was properly evaluated using a...more
INLINE PLASTICS CORP V. LACERTA GROUP, LLC -
Before Taranto, Chen, and Hughes. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts....more
IN RE CELLECT, LLC -
Before Lourie, Dyk, and Reyna. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: Obviousness-type double patenting analyses for patents with Patent Term Adjustments are based on the...more
8/31/2023
/ Escape Clauses ,
Ex Parte ,
Obviousness ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Term Adjustment ,
Patent Term Extensions ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
Terminal Disclaimer ,
USPTO
CUPP COMPUTING AS v. TREND MICRO INC. [OPINION] -
Before Dyk, Taranto, and Stark. Appeal from Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: Patent Owners cannot attempt to narrow claims by disclaiming claim scope during an...more
Summary: Despite cancelling a claim prior to assignment, assignor estoppel still applied to bar invalidity defenses against a related claim because the assignor warranted the validity of the cancelled claim and the cancelled...more
APPLE INC. v. MPH TECHNOLOGIES OY -
Before Moore, Prost, and Taranto. Appeal from Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: The proximity of concepts in a claim may link the concepts together and affect the plain meaning...more