Rule 2305, a first-of-its-kind air district rule, will impose new costs on warehouses and the Southern California supply chain, potentially testing legal boundaries of local authority to regulate “indirect sources” of...more
California’s recent ban on the importation and sale of alligator products in the state has faced significant legal pushback from retailers and wholesalers of alligator products, the federal government, and others, and has...more
Revisions to regs may be good news for purveyors of almonds, cookies and potato products, among other acrylamide-containing foods targeted by Proposition 65 plaintiffs.
The Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment...more
Ninth Circuit considers whether federal law takes precedence over California statute requiring warnings about chemicals.
Hardeman v. Monsanto, pending before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal, raises issues as to whether a...more
6/12/2020
/ Amicus Briefs ,
California ,
Cancer ,
Chemicals ,
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ,
FIFRA ,
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ,
Manufacturers ,
Monsanto ,
Pesticides ,
Popular ,
Proposition 65 ,
Retailers ,
Toxic Chemicals ,
Warning Labels