Recently, the Arizona Court of Appeals answered another lingering question of paramount importance to the construction industry – whether homebuilders and other construction industry professionals may be indefinitely subject...more
Welcome to the fall 2013 issue of Under Construction. In this issue, we focus on the economic loss doctrine and how the different courts in our firm’s footprint treat it similarly and differently. We hope you enjoy our review...more
Last week, in Sullivan v. Pulte Home Corp., No. CV-12-0419-PR, Arizona’s highest court took on a lingering question about the scope of economic loss doctrine since its landmark decision of Flagstaff Affordable Hous. Ltd....more
In This Issue:
Letter from the Editor; Colorado Construction Law Developments in 2012; Arizona Court of Appeals Issues Decision Related to the Application of the Statute of Repose and Economic Loss Doctrine for...more
12/31/2012
/ Airspace ,
Construction Contracts ,
Construction Cranes ,
Construction Defects ,
Duty to Defend ,
Easements ,
Economic Loss Doctrine ,
Employer Liability Issues ,
Implied Warranty of Habitability ,
Indemnity Agreements ,
Legal Costs ,
Privity of Contract ,
Property Improvements ,
Retroactive Application ,
Statute of Repose ,
Vicarious Liability