Most standard setting organizations require their members to agree to license their standard essential patents (SEPs) on fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory terms. But there is no bright-line rule for determining whether...more
5/2/2025
/ Due Diligence ,
FRAND ,
Intellectual Property Litigation ,
IP License ,
License Agreements ,
Litigation Strategies ,
Negotiations ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Portfolios ,
Patents ,
Risk Assessment ,
Standard Essential Patents ,
Webinars
Standard-essential patent (SEP) licensing remains a critical issue in Europe, where political bodies and national courts at times diverge in the interpretation of fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) licensing...more
4/25/2025
/ Appeals ,
EU ,
FRAND ,
Germany ,
Intellectual Property Litigation ,
Intellectual Property Protection ,
IP License ,
License Agreements ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patents ,
Regulatory Requirements ,
Standard Essential Patents
In November 2024, the Local Division (LD) Mannheim of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) issued the UPC’s first-ever substantive decision on standard essential patents (SEPs) and fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND)...more
4/17/2025
/ Antitrust Provisions ,
Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ,
EU ,
European Commission ,
FRAND ,
Germany ,
Injunctions ,
Injunctive Relief ,
Jurisdiction ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patents ,
Standard Essential Patents ,
Unified Patent Court
With the advent of generative artificial intelligence (or “GenAI”), many companies have begun to shift their innovation strategies to incorporate and rely on GenAI tools. These tools can be powerful drivers of technological...more
1/8/2025
/ Artificial Intelligence ,
CLS Bank v Alice Corp ,
Corporate Counsel ,
Intellectual Property Protection ,
Inventors ,
Machine Learning ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent-Eligible Subject Matter ,
Patents ,
Technology Sector ,
USPTO
Introduction - Litigators have long understood that jurors’ opinions at the end of opening statements color, and correlate strongly with, how they interpret the evidence at trial. A 1940s study that assessed mock jurors at...more