In its 2016 decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 136 S. Ct. 1540 (2016), the U.S. Supreme Court held that alleging a “bare procedural violation [of a statute], divorced from any concrete harm” was insufficient to satisfy the...more
6/29/2021
/ Article III ,
Class Action ,
Class Members ,
Credit Reporting Agencies ,
Credit Reports ,
Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) ,
Injury-in-Fact ,
SCOTUS ,
Standing ,
TransUnion ,
TransUnion LLC v Ramirez
The U.S. Supreme Court in Home Depot U. S. A., Inc. v. Jackson, No. 17-1471, 2019 WL 2257158 (U.S. May 28, 2019) held that a third-party defendant first named in a counterclaim cannot remove cases under either the general...more
5/29/2019
/ CAFA ,
Class Action ,
Co-Defendants ,
Counterclaims ,
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ,
General Removal Provisions ,
Home Depot USA Inc v Jackson ,
Jurisdiction ,
Remand ,
Removal ,
SCOTUS ,
Third-Party
In Spokeo v. Robins, the U.S. Supreme Court (6-2) reversed the Ninth Circuit’s holding that an alleged violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act was sufficient by itself to create a case or controversy required for a...more
Plaintiffs’ class action attorneys tend to follow trends. They are a savvy breed of attorney, at once creative and lazy (or efficient, depending on one’s perspective). One attorney discovers a statute, claim, or industry, and...more
5/28/2015
/ All Natural ,
Anheuser-Busch ,
Ascertainable Class ,
Class Action ,
Class Certification ,
Consumer Fraud ,
Defense Strategies ,
False Advertising ,
Liquor ,
Motion to Dismiss ,
Product Labels ,
Skinnygirl Margarita ,
Unfair or Deceptive Trade Practices ,
Wine & Alcohol
In this issue:
- Where did these cases come from?
- What are these cases about?
- Who is driving these cases?
- What are the Plaintiffs suing for?
- Who is a likely target?
- How can...more