In North American Fire Ultimate Holdings, LP v. Alan Doorly, the Delaware Court of Chancery held that the restrictive covenants included in an incentive unit grant agreement were unenforceable when the units received by the...more
5/23/2025
/ Acquisition Agreements ,
Breach of Contract ,
Compensation & Benefits ,
Consideration ,
Contract Disputes ,
Contract Terms ,
Employee Incentive Plans ,
Employment Contract ,
Employment Litigation ,
Forfeiture ,
Motion to Dismiss ,
Non-Compete Agreements ,
Restrictive Covenants ,
Unenforceable Contract Terms
Purchase agreements customarily contain provisions for resolving certain disputes by referring them to a third-party neutral decision-maker outside of litigation. For example, disputes over purchase price adjustments are...more
In West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. Moelis & Company, the Delaware Court of Chancery invalidated a set of approval rights contained in a stockholder agreement as facially in conflict with Section 141(a) of the...more
In Sjunde AP-Fonden v. Activision Blizzard, Inc., the Delaware Court of Chancery refused to dismiss claims against Activision Blizzard, Inc. (the company) and its board of directors (the board) that the board had violated,...more
In a landmark decision, the Delaware Court of Chancery addressed, for the first time, the precise duties that a controlling stockholder owes, and the standard of review that will apply, when a controlling stockholder takes...more
1/26/2024
/ Board of Directors ,
Breach of Duty ,
Business Disputes ,
Business Litigation ,
Business Plans ,
Controlling Stockholders ,
Fiduciary Duty ,
Interference Claims ,
Liquidation ,
Private Equity Funds ,
Publicly-Traded Companies ,
Shareholder Rights ,
Voting Rights
In Texas Pacific Land Corp. v. Horizon Kinetics, LLC, et al., the Delaware Court of Chancery enforced a “no drafting history clause” that restricted the court’s ability to consider “the events of drafting or preparation” to...more
Recently, in Colon v. Bumble, the Delaware Court of Chancery held that certain provisions in the charter of Bumble, Inc. (Bumble), which contemplated that each share of stock carried either one vote or 10 votes depending upon...more
In Crispo v. Musk, the Delaware Court of Chancery considered the enforceability of a so-called “Con Ed” provision contained in a merger agreement governing the well-publicized and troubled acquisition of Twitter, Inc....more
In Frontline Techs. Parent, LLC v. Murphy (Aug. 23, 2023), the Delaware Court of Chancery rejected enforcement of former employees’ noncompetition restrictions because the agreement language did not prohibit competition with...more
The latest proposed amendments to the Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL) will simplify the process for ratifying defective corporate acts; eliminate or reduce the stockholder vote required to authorize some types of...more
This year’s proposed amendments to the Delaware Revised Uniform Partnership Act (Partnership Act), the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act (LLC Act), and the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act (LP Act)...more
In Hyde Park Venture Partners Fund III, L.P. v. FairXchange, LLC, the Delaware Court of Chancery provided a valuable reminder to corporations and their directors and officers that a corporation cannot assert a privilege, such...more