2019 witnessed a number of developments in challenges to reverse-payment settlements. In its first decision on a pay-for-delay settlement since the Supreme Court’s seminal 2013 decision in FTC v. Actavis, the FTC took an...more
Last Wednesday, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals partially vacated the judgment of the district court in In re Actos End-Payor Antitrust Litigation. In doing so, the Second Circuit allowed only plaintiffs’ claims that...more
2/15/2017
/ Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) ,
Anti-Competitive ,
Antitrust Litigation ,
Causation ,
Corporate Counsel ,
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ,
Generic Drugs ,
Hatch-Waxman ,
Method Claims ,
Motion to Dismiss ,
Patents ,
Pharmaceutical Industry ,
Product Exclusivity
It has been over three years since the Supreme Court’s Actavis decision. Since then, numerous putative class actions alleging harm to competition as a result of “reverse-payment” settlements have flooded the courts. The...more
11/10/2016
/ Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) ,
Actavis Inc. ,
Anti-Competitive ,
Antitrust Violations ,
Appeals ,
AstraZeneca ,
Class Action ,
Exclusivity ,
Generic Drugs ,
Hatch-Waxman ,
Nexium ,
Patents ,
Reverse Payment Settlement Agreements ,
Summary Judgment ,
Teva Pharmaceuticals
Direct and indirect purchasers of Nexium recently appealed District of Massachusetts Judge William Young’s denial of a request for a new trial in In re: Nexium to the First Circuit. As we previously reported, In re: Nexium...more