Arbitrator, Not Court, Decides If Arbitration Agreement Allows Class Arbitration, California Supreme Court Rules

by Ballard Spahr LLP

Ballard Spahr LLP

A divided California Supreme Court has held that an arbitrator, rather than a court, should determine whether an arbitration clause in an employment agreement allows employees to bring their claims in arbitration on a class-wide basis where the agreement is silent on the issue of class arbitration.

In Sandquist v. Lebo Automotive, Inc., a former sales manager working for an auto dealership filed a class action racial discrimination suit, claiming that he and other African American employees suffered harassment and were passed over for promotions based on race. The trial court ordered the case to be arbitrated, ruling that Sandquist could move forward only with his individual claims. The California Court of Appeals for the Second District reversed, and the California Supreme Court affirmed the appeals court in a 4-3 decision.

Writing for the majority, Justice Kathryn Mickle Werdegar found that “no universal rule allocates [the determination of the availability of class-wide arbitration] to either arbitrators or courts.” Because California law does not address the issue and “no contrary presumption requires a different result” under federal law, the court held that there is no universal rule and the decision maker is identified on a case-by-case basis according to the parties’ underlying agreement.

The majority found that the arbitration agreement in the case at issue was ambiguous regarding who could decide whether claims could be arbitrated class-wide. When the agreement of the parties is ambiguous, the court explained, “ordinary contract principles require that the provision be construed against the drafter’s interpretation and in favor of the non-drafter’s interpretation.” The court found that the employer “could have prepared an arbitration provision that explicitly addressed any unstated desire to have the availability of class arbitration resolved by a court, notwithstanding the otherwise broad and all encompassing language of the clause identifying matters for the arbitrator;” however, “[i]t did not.” Therefore, the court construed the arbitration agreement against the employer and held that an arbitrator could decide whether to hear the class-wide claims.

The dissent, written by Justice Leondra Kruger, explained that the U.S. Supreme Court has strongly suggested that courts should decide this issue. Moreover, the dissent emphasized, to date, “every federal court of appeals to consider the issue on the merits has held that the availability of class arbitration is a question of arbitrability for a court, rather than an arbitrator, ‘unless the parties clearly and unmistakably provide otherwise.’” That is because “class arbitration dramatically increases the risks to defendants” and because the switch from bilateral to class arbitration implicates the rights of absent parties. This is not a mere procedural matter for an arbitrator to decide, but rather a critical gateway matter of arbitrability that a court should decide, Justice Kruger opined. After surveying relevant federal case law, the dissent concluded, “[i]t may well be that further developments in the United States Supreme Court will shed new light on the issue before us. But unless and until the court revisits the issue, I would follow where the court has led. Because the majority today charts a different path, I must respectfully dissent.”

Sandquist supports the strategy of plaintiffs who are clearly bound to arbitrate their claims but want to resist individual proceedings. However, most companies view class arbitration as the worst of all possible worlds, since class-wide liability can often be draconian and there are only narrow grounds for appealing an arbitrator’s award. Therefore, employers should make sure that their arbitration clauses expressly preclude class-wide arbitration and specifically state that a court will decide whether or not the arbitration clause applies to a particular class of plaintiffs. Sandquist demonstrates that arbitration clauses that are silent or ambiguous on this issue can unwittingly subject a company to the perils of class-wide arbitration.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ballard Spahr LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Ballard Spahr LLP

Ballard Spahr LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.