Bad Faith Sentinel - March 2013

Saul Ewing LLP
Contact

In This Issue:

- Southern District Of Ohio: Insurer Does Not Commit Bad Faith By Voiding Policy Due To Insured’s Failure To Promptly And Fully Cooperate With Insurer’s Fire Investigation

- Pennsylvania Court Makes Clear That Pre-Contract Conduct Cannot Form The Basis Of A Bad Faith Claim

- Eighth Circuit: Insurer Awarded Summary Judgment on Claims of Bad Faith Refusal to Settle Where Sole Member of A Company Was Also An Employee for Purposes of Applying Exclusion

- New York Appellate Court: Punitive Damages Against Insured Are Not Recoverable From Insurer page

- Excerpt from Southern District Of Ohio Insurer Does Not Commit Bad Faith By Voiding Policy Due To Insured’s Failure To Promptly And Fully Cooperate With Insurer’s Fire Investigation:

On August 18, 2010, a fire destroyed the residence of plaintiff Namon Joseph (“Joseph”). Defendant State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“State Farm”) provided Joseph with homeowner’s insurance at the time of the fire. State Farm’s investigation quickly revealed evidence that the fire was started by an accelerant, and therefore likely was an act of arson.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Saul Ewing LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Saul Ewing LLP
Contact
more
less

Saul Ewing LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide