Bankruptcy Proof of Claim on Time-Barred Debt Does Not Violate FDCPA, SCOTUS Rules

by Ballard Spahr LLP

Ballard Spahr LLP

Filing a proof of claim in a debtor's Chapter 13 bankruptcy case on a debt that is "obviously time barred" does not violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in a 5-3 decision. The decision represents a defeat for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which filed an amicus brief with the Court in support of the debtor.

In Midland Funding, LLC v. Aleida Johnson, Midland had filed a proof of claim asserting that the debtor owed Midland a credit card debt in a specified amount and indicating that a specified month and year (which was more than 10 years before the debtor filed her bankruptcy) was the last time a charge appeared on the debtor's account. The relevant statute of limitations was six years. The debtor's counsel objected to the claim, which was disallowed by the bankruptcy court. Thereafter, the debtor brought an FDCPA suit against Midland, which was dismissed by the district court. The 11th Circuit reversed, holding that the filing of a proof of claim that is accurate but based on a time-barred debt can violate the FDCPA and that such an FDCPA claim was not precluded by the Bankruptcy Code.

The Supreme Court, in an opinion written by Justice Breyer, reversed the 11th Circuit's decision and found that by filing its proof of claim, Midland had not made a "false, deceptive, or misleading representation" or used an "unfair or unconscionable means" to collect or attempt to collect a debt in violation of the FDCPA. The debtor had argued that Midland's proof of claim was "false, deceptive, or misleading" because under the Bankruptcy Code, a "claim" means an "enforceable claim." Unable to find support in the Code for the debtor's interpretation, the Court indicated that "to determine whether a statement is misleading normally 'requires consideration of the legal sophistication of its audience.'" The Court found that this standard was not met, observing that "the audience in Chapter 13 bankruptcy cases includes a trustee" and "that trustee is likely to understand that, as the Code says, a proof of claim is a statement by the creditor that he or she has a right to payment subject to disallowance (including disallowance based upon…untimeliness.)"

Calling it a "closer question" whether Midland's filing of an obviously time-barred claim was "unfair" or "unconscionable" under the FDCPA, the Court observed that it was "not convinced" by circuit court precedent finding a debt collector's assertion of a time-barred claim in ordinary civil litigation to be "unfair." In the Court's view, the context of a Chapter 13 bankruptcy proceeding "differs significantly" from the context of civil suits where "the lower courts rested their conclusions upon their concern that a consumer might unwittingly repay a time-barred debt." The Court found that such concern had "significantly diminished force" in the bankruptcy context because of the claims process, which includes "a knowledgeable trustee."

The Court was also "not persuaded" by the debtor's arguments that the practice of filing time-barred claims "risks harm to the debtor" and that there was no legitimate reason for allowing such filings. Observing again that the bankruptcy claims process treats untimeliness as an affirmative defense, the Court was unwilling to carve out an exception to "the simple affirmative defense approach" and "authorize a new significant bankruptcy-related remedy in the absence of language in the [Bankruptcy] Code providing for it."

The Supreme Court expressly stated that it "has not decided and does not now decide" whether a debtor collector's assertion of a time-barred claim in an ordinary civil lawsuit is an FDCPA violation. Indeed, in a blog post about the Midland decision, a law professor commented that although it reached the correct result, the Supreme Court should have used a different rationale, namely that the FDCPA only covers non-judicial debt collection and was not intended to address attempts to collect unenforceable debt through the judicial system.

In her dissent, in which Justices Ginsburg and Kagan joined, Justice Sotomayor took aim at debt buyers who "file claims in bankruptcy proceedings for stale debts and hope that no one notices that they are too old to be enforced." In her view, "it does not take a sophisticated attorney to understand why [such] practice is unfair" and instead "takes only the common sense to conclude that one should not be able to profit on the inadvertent inattention of others." She expresses hope that Congress will "amend the FDCPA to make explicit what in [her] view is already implicit in the law."

The Supreme Court is expected to soon issue another important FDCPA decision. In April 2017, it heard oral argument in a case involving whether a company that purchases debts, including debts that are in default, from another company and then attempts to collect those debts for its own benefit, is considered a "debt collector" under the FDCPA.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ballard Spahr LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Ballard Spahr LLP

Ballard Spahr LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.