Big surprises in the No Surprises Act

McAfee & Taft
Contact

McAfee & Taft

In one of the biggest attempts by the federal government to combat surprise medical billing, Congress in late 2020 passed the No Surprises Act (NSA), which imposes a host of new transparency and coverage requirements for employer-sponsored group health plans. Many of the most significant coverage changes were required to be implemented on Jan. 1, 2022, for most plans.

There are two main surprise billing situations the NSA regulates. With the first, a participant visits an in-network facility, but one of the treating providers, such as the anesthesiologist, is out-of-network. After the NSA, participants are responsible only for in-network cost-sharing amounts (copay, co-insurance) to the out-of-network provider, and payments count toward the in-network deductible. An exception exists for certain “non-ancillary services” in which, only after the participant receives notice of, and consents to, the out-of-network price, he or she may receive a balance bill.

Second, although not a completely new requirement, group health plans must impose in-network cost-sharing when participants visit an out-of-network emergency room for emergency services. While this has been the rule for emergency rooms connected to a hospital since the Affordable Care Act, the NSA expands these requirements to independent, free-standing emergency rooms if licensed as such by the state.

When in-network cost-sharing rates are required for an out-of-network provider, cost-sharing is typically based on the “qualifying payment amount” (QPA) and not the actual billed amount. The QPA is a complex formula — essentially the average in-network rate for the plan or its third-party administrator.

However, the QPA only determines how much the participant must pay. For the plan’s share of the bill, the NSA imposes a new, mandatory independent dispute resolution (IDR) process. If the provider and plan cannot agree on a price for the service through voluntary negotiations, either party may initiate the IDR process. A government-approved IDR entity arbitrates the dispute. Both parties submit evidence and a price that each believes to be the appropriate payment. The IDR entity is then required to choose one of the payment proposals — typically the one closest to the QPA.

Takeaway: Employers should work with their health plan service providers to ensure these requirements have been timely implemented operationally, and that the plan document will be amended accordingly.

This article appeared in the January 13, 2022, issue of The Journal Record. It is reproduced with permission from the publisher. © The Journal Record Publishing Co.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© McAfee & Taft | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

McAfee & Taft
Contact
more
less

McAfee & Taft on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.