CA Supreme Court Announces New Test On Whether Workers Are Employees Or Contractors

by Fox Rothschild LLP

Fox Rothschild LLP

Establishing that a worker in California is an independent contractor, as opposed to an employee, has always been difficult.

Now the California Supreme Court has made it even harder.

In Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Courtthe justices were asked to decide what test determines whether a worker is an employee under the California Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Orders.

Under the new test, workers are presumed to be employees of a hiring business unless the business can satisfy three separate requirements to establish the worker's independent contractor status.

We cannot overstate the importance of this decision. The wage orders guarantee employees, among other things, minimum wages, maximum hours, overtime compensation, and meal and rest breaks. Independent contractors do not receive those protections. The court’s broad interpretation of the meaning of “employee” under the wage orders will require many businesses that currently rely on independent contractors to reclassify workers as employees. This will not only impose substantial costs on businesses that have relied on independent contractors, but also subject them to liability for not previously providing the wages, breaks, overtime, etc. that employees are entitled to.


Two delivery drivers sued Dynamex, a courier and delivery company, alleging that it improperly classified them and similarly situated drivers as independent contractors. The drivers set their own schedules, decide what deliveries they’ll make, and use their own vehicles. They are sometimes required to wear clothing with the Dynamex logo or place that logo on their vehicles. They are allowed to hire others to do the work and to work for other delivery companies or for themselves.

The trial court, in certifying the class of drivers, found that the wage orders define the term “employ” to mean “(a) exercise control over the worker’s wages, hours, or working conditions, (b) suffer or permit work, or (c) to engage, thereby creating a common law employment relationship.” The trial court rejected Dynamex’s contention that the multifactor test of employees articulated in the California Supreme Court’s 1989 decision in S.G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v Department of Industrial Affairs governed whether a worker was an employee or independent contractor under the California’s wage orders. This is despite the fact that courts and administrative agencies in California have been using the test for decades. Even the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, which enforces the Wage Orders, states in its Enforcement Policies and Interpretations Manual that the Borello test applies.

Dynamex moved to decertify the class, arguing that two of the alternative definitions of “employ” discussed in another California Supreme Court case, Martinez v Combs (2010) 49 Cal.4th 35, 64the “suffer or permit” and the “engage” tests, did not apply in this context. Both the trial court and the Court of Appeal rejected Dynamex’s argument. Dynamex filed a petition for review with the California Supreme Court, and the Court agreed to consider the issue.

The California Supreme Court agreed that the multi-factor Borello test, which focuses on the employer’s ability to control the manner and means of accomplishing the desired result, is not the only test to determine if a worker is an employee or an independent contractor. As it has done frequently of late, the court explained that it must interpret these protections broadly to protect workers from unscrupulous employers. The court also concluded that the new test it articulates provides greater clarity and consistency than a test that involves balancing multiple factors on a case-by-case basis.

The New Test

The court adopted what is known as the “ABC test.” Workers are presumed to be employees of a hiring business unless the business can satisfy three separate requirements.

To establish that a worker is an independent contractor under the wage orders, the business must show that: (A) the worker is free from the control and direction of the hiring business in connection with the performance of the work; (B) the worker performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business; and (C) the worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business. The court, in its discretion, may start with any prong of three prongs of the test to resolve the question whether the workers are properly classified as independent contractors.

Prong “A” looks at whether the hiring business is able to control and direct what the worker does, both under the terms of the contract and in actual practice. The business need not control the exact manner or details of the work, as long as it maintains the level of control employers typically maintain over employees.

Under prong “B”, the worker must be performing tasks outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business. This will be especially problematic for companies in the gig economy that rely heavily on independent contractors. No matter how much freedom those workers have to decide when to work, where to work, or what to do, if they are performing services in the usual course of the hiring company’s business, they will be deemed to be employees of the business. The Court used the examples of a retail business that hired an outside plumber to repair a leak and a clothing manufacturer that hired an at-home seamstress to make clothes from patterns and cloth supplied by the company. The outside plumber would be an independent contractor because he performed services outside the company’s usual course of business, but the seamstress would be an employee since the work performed is within the company’s usual course of business.

Under prong “C”, the workers must be customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business. The workers must have independently decided to go into business for themselves and, in doing so, independently accepted the burdens and benefits of self-employment. Further, it is not enough that the company has not prohibited a worker from engaging in such a business. To meet this standard, the individual should have taken the steps to establish and promote their individual business such as through incorporation or licensure, creating business cards, advertisement, or routinely offering their services to the public or to other potential customers. Unless the employer can satisfy all three prongs, the worker is considered an employee.

Key Takeaway

The new test is considerably broader and more inclusive than the S.G. Borello & Sons test which courts, agencies, and employers in California have relied on for years. Consequently, many businesses will need to revisit whether their workers qualify as independent contractors. If they do not, the businesses need to either modify the relationship or start providing the workers with the pay and treatment required by the wage orders. Since the decision only addresses the wage order requirements, different standards will apply in determining whether the workers are independent contractors for purposes such as workers’ compensation and payroll taxes.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Fox Rothschild LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Fox Rothschild LLP

Fox Rothschild LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.