CFPB Suffers Setback in RESPA Lawsuit

by Dorsey & Whitney LLP

A District Court in Kentucky recently rejected the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (“CFPB”) claim against a law firm brought under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“RESPA”), granting the law firm summary judgment in connection with its activities with nine real estate joint ventures surrounding the sale of title insurance policies because the Court found that the law firm’s activities fell within RESPA’s safe harbor provision.  The case is styled Consumer Fin. Prot. Bureau v. Borders & Borders, PLC, 3:13-cv-01047-CRS-DW, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108384 (W.D. Ky. July 13, 2017).

RESPA Background

RESPA, 12 U.S.C. § 2601, et seq., enacted in 1974, regulates “settlement services” associated with the sale of real estate, e.g., title inspection, termite inspection, and the retention of an attorney to check for errors in the sales contract.  The CFPB is now responsible for RESPA public enforcement actions.

Section 8(a) of RESPA prohibits people from giving and receiving any “fee, kickback, or thing of value pursuant to any agreement or understanding” that pertains to real estate settlement services involving a federally-related mortgage loan.  Violators face up to one year in prison, civil liability, and/or public enforcement actions.

Safe Harbor Under RESPA

Congress enacted a safe harbor provision in 1983 that shelters “affiliated business arrangements.”  12 U.S.C. § 2607(c)(4).  To qualify for the safe harbor provision, (1) the business arrangement must be disclosed to the person being referred to an affiliated business, (2) the person being referred is not required to use the service, and (3) the only thing of value that is received from the arrangements is a return on the ownership interest or franchise relationship.  The safe harbor provision also shelters lenders who require a buyer, borrower, or seller to pay for the services of an attorney, credit reporting agency, or real estate appraiser chosen by the lender to represent the lender’s interest in the transaction.  Additionally, the safe harbor provision protects arrangements whereby attorneys or law firms represent clients in a real estate transaction and issue or arrange for the issuance of title insurance in the transaction directly as agent or through a separate corporate insurance agency that may be established by the attorney or law firm and operated as an adjunct to the attorney’s law practice.

CFPB v. Borders & Borders, PLC

In October 2013, the CFPB sued Borders & Borders, PLC, a family-owned law firm that performs residential real estate closings in Louisville, Kentucky.  Borders & Borders is often hired by lenders to prepare real estate conveyance and mortgage documents and to conduct real estate closings.  The firm is authorized to issue title insurance policies for various title insurance companies.

In 2006, Borders & Borders established joint ventures with nine real estate service providers in Louisville (the “Title LLCs”).  These joint venture partners were to provide title insurance when the lender did not maintain internal lender-owned title agencies.

Borders & Borders disclosed the relationship between itself and the Title LLCs to the borrowers and buyers when it referred them to the Title LLCs to obtain title insurance.  The borrowers and buyers had 30 days from the date of the closings to decide whether to purchase owner’s title insurance from the Title LLCs.  The Title LLCs issued more than 1,000 title insurance policies for more than 700 real estate closings between October 2009 and February 2011 (the Title LLCs were dissolved in 2011 when the investigation began).

Borders & Borders’ principals were 50% owners of the Title LLCs, and the venture partners held the remaining 50%.  The Title LLCs had written operating agreements, were authorized to conduct business in Kentucky, held insurance policies, were subject to audit, had separate operating bank accounts, had separate escrow bank accounts, made profit distributions, filed tax returns, and were solvent.

The CFPB’s suit against Borders & Borders alleged violations of section 8(a) of RESPA.  The CFPB claimed that Borders & Borders’ arranging for the Title LLCs to pay distributions to the joint venture partners for their participation as members constituted a fee, kickback, or thing of value, in contravention of the statute.  The CFPB further argued that the Title LLCs were not protected by the safe harbor provisions because they were not “providers of settlement services”; moreover, the language in the forms provided to potential buyers did not conform with the statutory requirements.

Both sides filed for summary judgment.

The Court’s Decision

In its decision, the Court denied Borders & Borders’ motion for summary judgment as to whether the CFPB had shown that it violated section 8(a) of the statute.  Indeed, the Court found that the CFPB had met its burden, demonstrating that: (1) the Title LLCs received a “thing of value” because they were compensated when business was referred to their LLC; (2) compensation was made pursuant to an agreement to refer settlement business to Borders & Borders; (3) actual referrals were made between Borders & Borders and the Title LLCs – as acknowledged by Borders & Borders; and (4) the transactions involved federally-related mortgages.

However, the Court found that Borders & Borders’ activities fell within the safe harbor of section 8(c)(4) because operation of the Title LLCs satisfied the elements of an “affiliated business arrangement” pursuant to the safe harbor provision.

First, the Court found that the disclosure forms were timely made because they were made at the time Borders & Borders referred title insurance work.  Court also found that the disclosures were sufficient under RESPA.  The Court reasoned that section 8(c)(4) does not specify what the disclosures must include – only that the disclosures explain the existence of the affiliated business arrangement.

Second, the Court found that Borders & Borders’ customers were not required to use the Title LLCs.

Third, the Court found that the only “thing of value” received by members of the Title LLCs was an ownership interest.

Accordingly, the Court granted Borders & Borders’ summary judgment motion on this basis, and conversely denied the CFPB’s motion for partial summary judgment.

In response to Borders & Borders’ argument that the CFPB’s request for disgorgement was improper, the Court concluded that the statute allows for the exercise of all inherent equitable powers, and since disgorgement is a traditional equitable remedy, CFPB could seek it.

Finally, the Court rejected Borders & Borders’s ultra vires act argument that the CFPB does not have the authority to make a complaint because its structure is unconstitutional under PHH Corp. v. CFPB, 839 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2016).  The Court concluded that, because the D.C. Circuit has yet to review the PHH Corp. decision en banc, and because Borders & Borders relied solely on that case to support its argument, the Court would decline to address this argument.

The Court’s decision to provide safe harbor status to Borders & Borders here may well implicate other cases the CFPB has brought under RESPA.  Time will tell whether CFPB will appeal this decision to the Sixth Circuit and to what extent the CFPB’s regulatory powers will be impacted by this ruling.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.